The HC has set condition of servicing the notice to you. Did you receive any notice? You should have appeared.
There is an unwarranted intruption.
With the grace of god you shall succeed.Approach your lawyer.
Kumar Doab (FIN) 17 May 2012
The HC has set condition of servicing the notice to you. Did you receive any notice? You should have appeared.
There is an unwarranted intruption.
With the grace of god you shall succeed.Approach your lawyer.
Kumar Doab (FIN) 17 May 2012
The HC has set condition of servicing the notice to you. Did you receive any notice? You should have appeared.
There is an unwarranted intruption.
With the grace of god you shall succeed.Approach your lawyer.
Dr. MPS RAMANI Ph.D.[Tech.] (Scientist/Engineer) 03 July 2012
How can a stay order or for that metter any order of a court be kept secret? If you had yourself kept in touch with the developments, you would have come to know immediately.
Kumar Doab (FIN) 21 July 2012
Good move.
One properly informed employee is sufficient in the life time of high headed, adamant, and repressive, recalcitrant, offender management and employer.
Let them once again stand in the corridors and sit on the bench of court of law. Let their names be called to appear before court of law and let them in box ( Katghara) and let them go back to office and home and tell each one what happened to them.
They shall tell everyone or they shall hide? Different people have different character.
However those who are around watch and understand.
It is felt that you have resolve, perseverance, evidence to win the case and to prove the malafide at later stage.
Kumar Doab (FIN) 11 August 2012
The company has probably foreseen the expected outcome of the dispute being heard in CGIT and is afraid that based on merits the decision shall be in your favor and hence the writ. Can your services be transferred to Ahmedabad as per transfer mobility policy of the company? It is felt that as per your posts it can not be. Company is burdening you with litigation. However you should put in your best defense and should succeed in convincing the HC that proceedings at CGIT are not quashed and in getting a decision to let the proceeding at CGIT conclude .
revribhav (Hindi) 18 April 2013
revribhav (Hindi) 01 May 2013
efiling.sci <efiling.sci@nic.in> Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 4:39 PM
To: Revribhav <revribhav@gmail.com>
Re-Filing of documents done by you in D.No. 41357 of 2012 on 23.03.2013 have been sent to the concerned Section X for further necessary action.
revribhav (Hindi) 03 May 2013
https://rhccasestatus.raj.nic.in/smsrhcb/rhbcis/index.asp
PENDING
Date of query : 3/5/2013 Time : 7:54:36 AM
CW'4007' of 2012 - R 7659/2012
Petitioner : NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO ANR
Respondent: U O I (MINISTRY OF LABOUR )ORS
Petitioner Advocate: VIRENDRA SINGH YADAV
Respondent Advocate: SHASHANK SHARMA
Class Code : 1502 Registered on : 22/3/2012
Bench : SB Stage : FOR ADMISSION- NOTICE SERVED
DATE GIVEN BY: PESHI CLERK DATE
Peshi Date : 6/5/2013
Listing in court No. 8 on 30/07/2012
Department Details
Dept Type Dept Code Dept Name
S 46 Labour
Paper Details
No. Type Date of filing
45469/2012 AFFIDAVIT 29/9/2012
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO ANR VS U O I (MINISTRY OF LABOUR )ORS VIRENDRA SINGH YADAV Court Fee :
Proc. Fee :
27993/2012 APPLICATION 5/7/2012
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO ANR VS U O I (MINISTRY OF LABOUR )ORS SHRI GOPAL Court Fee : 2
Proc. Fee :
26528/2012 POWER 31/5/2012
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO ANR VS U O I (MINISTRY OF LABOUR )ORS SHASHANK SHARMA Court Fee :
Proc. Fee :
16238/2012 PF+NOTICE+EXTRA 10/4/2012
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO ANR VS U O I (MINISTRY OF LABOUR )ORS VIRENDRA SINGH YADAV Court Fee : 10
Proc. Fee :
revribhav (Hindi) 22 July 2013
rev ribhav <revribhav@yahoo.com> Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:21 AM
To: "arsekar@newindia.co.in" <arsekar@newindia.co.in>, "gsrinivasan@newindia.co.in" <gsrinivasan@newindia.co.in>, "kv.krishna@newindia.co.in" <kv.krishna@newindia.co.in>
21.07.13 chief justice rep 41357.pdf
719K View as HTML Scan and download
Revribhav <revribhav@gmail.com> Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:15 AM
To: ru-ol@mha.nic.in, dirimp_ol@nic.in, techcell-ol@nic.in
Cc: ENDcorruption <ENDcorruption@5thpillar.org>, "tiindia.newdelhi" <tiindia.newdelhi@gmail.com>, amnestyindiaorg <amnestyindiaorg@gmail.com>
Bcc: vigilance <vigilance@nic.in>, "ml.chulet" <ml.chulet@newindia.co.in>, "kamlesh.vashist" <kamlesh.vashist@nic.co.in>
For information and necessary action please:
Department of Official Language (Ministry of Home Affairs)
New Delhi-110003.
The photo of a well known bribe taker with insurance company chairman
as on 20 July 2012 has been attached in the writ petition.
I attach herewith the speaking declaration of his appointing
authority,Mrs. Kamlesh vashisht that she was unable to remove
him,despite corrupt act,because of head office.
complainant:
Shri Gopal Soni
C231
Panchsheel Nagar,
Ajmer-305004
Request for justice:pending writ petition Shri Gopal Soni,hindi translator,Ajmer
Revribhav
To: efiling.sci@nic.in, supremecourt@nic.in
Cc: nsr.chandraprasad@nic.co.in, aksinghal55@gmail.com, secyol@nic.in
Bcc: amnestyindiaorg@gmail.com, tiindia.newdelhi@gmail.com, revribhav2@gmail.com, revribhav@yahoo.com, pspradeep3@gmail.com
revribhav (Hindi) 22 July 2013
The attachment referred is attached herewith.
revribhav (Hindi) 18 August 2013
A few defects of technical nature are keeping the writ petition still pending with the registry of SCI
(as on 16.08.2013)
revribhav (Hindi) 20 May 2014
revribhav (Hindi) 20 June 2014
The writ petition has been updated as on 16.6.2014 and submitted by way of e-filing dated 20 July 2014