>>> Did you record calls made during which CCE stated that the investigation has gone in favor of bank and it shall start adding interest, late payment charges etc?
Did you place it on record and also that during investigation no one kept in touch with you and copy of investigation report, who conducted investigation, who were contacted, statements on record etc were never shared with you etc?
>>> You have lodged FIR and have provided copy to M/s ICICI Bank.
Has M/s ICICI Bank lodged a FIR? IN all probabilities;NO?
Did you ask the bank in writing under proper acknowledgment to lodge FIR on its own and jointly with you and provide you the copy of FIR, complaint with cyber crime? Did the bank reply in writing?
M/s ICICI bank as it is known for by various publications might not have lodged any complaint with any agency as then it shall have to wait for outcome/investigation report!
Instead of it M/s ICIC Bank has apparently preferred to become an investigating agency by itself, complete the inquiry without sharing anything with its customer and victim of cyber fraud.
On the top of it M/s ICICI Bank has not provided the copy of its inquiry report and has started adding penal charges in its BILLs!
Did you issue notice to MD, Chairman of M/s ICICI Bank to refrain from reporting your name as defaulter to credit bureaus?
>>> You should certainly contact a lawyer handing such cases and approach DCDRF for interim order leading to injunction ( STAY)………………………………………since M/s ICICI bank shall be sending your name to credit bureau’s like CIBIL……………………………as if you don’t pay the delinquency shall be reported.
This is Twist Arm tactics and your name shall remain in list of defaulters. Hence you may issue notice to M/s CIBIL also.
Another tactical reason is that by levying penal charges and including you in the list of defaulters the bank shall succeed to transfer the onus on you and you shall initiate litigation.
You should certainly approach a lawyer AS AP!
If you/your lawyer need judgments to support it come back to us.
{ Consumer Protection Act was amended in 2002 and section 13 (3-B) was added which empowers the consumer forum to pass interim orders.}
>>> If you don’t pay as per tantrums of M/s ICICI Bank you shall be chased by its recovery agents/agencies……………………
There are many threads that you may find relevant e.g;
https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Harrasment-by-icici-banks-recovery-agents-76271.asp#.UUc5U0pFZ_4
and many others:
https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Standard-chartered-and-shaha-finlease-95120.asp#.Utl35tK6a3Y
https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/Credit-card-problem--446451.asp#.Utl4H9K6a3Y
https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/Credit-card-defaulter-time-limitations--446061.asp#.Us7ig9IW1MA
https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/Credit-card-debt-448106.asp#.UvpMrEeBmXU
https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Standard-chartered-and-shaha-finlease-95120.asp#.Usvvc9IW1MA
https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/Credit-card-payment-443961.asp#.UsvwjNIW1MA
https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Credit-card-robbery-fraud-in-china-94830.asp#.UsvwUtIW1MA
https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/Harassment-by-recovery-agents--442841.asp#.UrhGa9IW1MA
https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Salary-account-freeze-without-my-notice-95425.asp#.UswXWNIW1MA
You shall observe that Bank of India voluntarily on its own came forward to compensate the customer in case f cyber fraud.
Whereas in cases involving Banks and CC companies like M/s ICICI bank, M/s HDFC bank…………………….. the courts had to be approached by harassed customers and courts of law directed these banks.
The question arises in today India while majority of the customers/citizens are well aware then Why they fall for such banks. The show and Glamour of such banks and their allurements should be compared with realities and one should stay away from such banks forever……………….
>>> You may also go thru various cases that have been decided by BO and maintained on record e.g;
Compendium of Cases Handled by the Banking Ombudsman Offices
https://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/Content/PDFs/71337.pdf
Complaint No. 2
Complaint in brief:
The complainant stated that he was a Savings Bank account holder maintaining
good balance with Madurai branch of X Bank since taken over. During his visit to
Malaysia between 2nd February and 16th February 2003, he used the Proton card
in a computer shop for purchasing a computer worth Rs.40,000/-. However the
card was rejected by the machine as the permissible amount per day was
Rs.15,000/- as per the terms on which the card was issued for usage abroad. On
checking up the statements, he was surprised to see 15 international debits in his
Savings Bank account on account of alleged use of Proton card between 10th
May 2003 and July 2003 amounting to Rs.28,981.33. Immediately, he gave
instructions to the Manager to stop the Proton card operation and lodged a
complaint about the wrongful 15 international debits amounting to Rs. 28,981.33.
He, therefore, requested the bank to reverse the wrong debits. The complainant
submitted proof that he was not abroad when the questioned debits took place.
Decision:
The complainant proved his point that he was away to Malaysia between 2nd
February 2003 and 16th February 2003 as per the photocopy of the passport
showing entry and exit to and from Malaysia. This was not contested by the
bank. The bank made an attempt to make a feeble plea that as per clause 45(c)
and 45(g) of the Proton Debit Card User’s guide, the bank shall not be liable to
the customer or any other party for any loss or damage suffered. The bank could
have got protection only if they could prove beyond doubt the complainant was
negligent. Unfortunately, the bank could not produce evidence to prove that the
complainant was negligent. Again the customer promptly informed the bank
about the alleged wrong international debits, the moment the statements were
made available to him when he called on the bank on 5th July. The bank had
ample time and opportunity to take up with the acquirer to call back the charge
slips, verify the signature and charge back the account. This would have helped
the customer and the bank from any financial loss. Therefore, the bank is
directed to reimburse the complainant the 15 disputed international debits in the
account allegedly due to use of Proton card issued to him by the bank. The bank
may, if they desire, ask the complainant to execute the indemnity in its favour.
>>> Do not forget to educate others from your experience.
Ask everyone in your circle to stay away from such banks and CC companies.