Send Your Feedback
Lawyersclubindia Mobile
Remember | Register | Forgot Password?
Bookmark This Page   RSS Feeds  Follow On Twitter

 



Forum Home > Procedure > Criminal Law > crpc   Unanswered Threads Post New Topic


09 February 2010, 14:12   Report Abuse

Report Abuse / Feedback


Name
Email
Subject
Message

Verify Verify Code 
  

Note : The above form can be used to intimate the moderators regarding abuse of the platform.


sreenath cochin

student



[ Scorecard : 261]


on recieving informastion regarding the commission of a cognizable offence the police officer proceeds to the scene of occurence,arrests the accused,siezes his clothes and sends the dead body to the hospital and thereafter records the statement of the eyewitness.the question is whether the statements recorded by police officer can be used as fir??


Share This


09 February 2010, 21:56  

ANIL KUMAR MENON

ADVOCATE



[ Scorecard : 1156]


The statement of the eyewitness recorded by the police officer cannot be used as an FIR because it is a statement recorded during the course of the investigation (161 statement) and therefore hit by the bar of s.162 Cr.P.C.


Message thanked : 1 times



09 February 2010, 23:07  

sreenath cochin

student



[ Scorecard : 261]


thank you sir



10 February 2010, 08:22  

Feroz M Shafeeque

Police Officer



[ Scorecard : 355]


Only after registration of the FIR can investigation be commenced. In this case, on receiving  vague information regarding the offence (over phone or some unreliable source), he can record the matter in the General Diary, an proceed to the scene of crime, after verifying the offence, take statement of some witness or informant, send it to police station for registration of FIR and after receiving the investigation copy from station, commence investigation.

 

If the information received by the police officer was clear, he should have registered an FIR before proceeding to the scene of occurrence.



10 February 2010, 17:13  

ANIL KUMAR MENON

ADVOCATE



[ Scorecard : 1156]


The Supreme Court has viwed the investigation of an offfence as

1. Proceeding to the spot

2. Ascertainment of the facts and circumstances of the case

3. Discovery and arrest of the suspected offender

4. Collecting of evidence relating to the commission of the offence which consist of:

a. examination of various persons Iincluding the accused and the reduction of their statements into writing, if the officers think fit

b. search of places of seizre of things considered necessary for the investigation or to be produced at the trial and

5. formation of the opinion as towhether on the materials collected there is a case to place the accused before a magistrate for trial, and if so, taking the necessary steps for the same by the filing of a charge sheet under s.173

Thus statements recorded during the above process would be 161 statement (except panchanamas) and therefore would be hit by the bar of 162 Cr.P.C.


Message thanked : 2 times


14 February 2010, 21:48  

Feroz M Shafeeque

Police Officer



[ Scorecard : 355]


Anil Kumar is right in saying that it is not valid to use the statement of witness as FIS after the investigation is commenced.

 

 Supreme Court in Tapan Kumar Singh Vs CBI,2003 ruled that investigation of a cognizable offence before registering FIR is valid if the information was entered in the General Diary before proceeding for investigation.


Message thanked : 1 times



Follow us on Twitter
Find us on Facebook


Related Files


 

Previous

Next

Related Topics / Similar Threads


 

Post your reply for : crpc

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies
Click here to login


Not a member yet ?? Click here to signup

Message


Subscribe to the latest topics :


Forum Home | Forum Portal | Control Center | Who is Where | Popular Threads | Today's Topic | Recent Posts | Today's Posts | Post New Topic | Thread With Files | Top Threads - Month | Unreplied Topics | Forum Stats