View Full Profile
In CIVIL APPEAL NO.3332 OF 2001 T.S. Ramachandra Shetty v. Chairman, Karnataka Housing Board& Another[i], the appellant had purchased only an year ago, the that very piece of land for Rs.45,000/- and after an year, the State had given compensati ..
In Naveen Kohli v. Neelu Kohli[1] His Lordship Hon. Dalveer Bhandari, J said : The foundation of a sound marriage is tolerance, adjustment and respecting one another. Tolerance to each other's fault to a certain bearable extent has to be inherent in ..
Ordinarily, a court would not interfere with the findings of the Enquiry Officer. He is entitled to draw his own inference and so long as the inference drawn by him is supported by some materials on record, it is well settled that a Court of judicial ..
Approbate and Reprobate; Case Laws-Approbate and Reprobate; Approbate and Reprobate-Relevant case laws ..
In Shankarasan Dash v. Union of India, (1991) 2 SCR 567 : (1991 AIR SCW 1583), a Constitution Bench had held that mere inclusion of the name in the list of selected candidates does not confer any right upon any candidate to be selected unless the rel ..
Section 362 Cr. P.C. clearly bars the court to alter or review its judgment or final order except to correct a clerical or arithmetical error. What is clerical or arithmetical error has been explained by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of 'Master Cons ..
The Apex Court has taken serious note of practice of transfer of property through power of attorney as a substitute to regular sale. In a SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO CC 5804/2009 Suraj Lamp & Industries (P) Ltd. Thru. DIR ...v.State of Haryana ..
Criminal courts have no inherent powers as compared to civil courts which has been conferred to set aside ex parte judgment or order and to review its own order under the provisions of C.P.C. There is no such corresponding provision in the Cr.P.C. O ..
This article is reproduction of views of Hon. Yatindra Singh,J (Allahabad High Court) while passing interim order in WRIT - A No. 16879 of 1999, Net Singh Vs. Labour Secy., U.P. Shasan Lko. & Others. Where his lordship observed that:“ The ..
In Criminal Misc. Application no. 4214 of 2007 Khalid Ahmad Khan v. State of U.P. and another an application was moved by new counsel for recalling P.W.1 Khalid Ahmad Khan for further cross examination on the ground that on the date whe ..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
