I am trying to frame question in as much technical parace as possible, as follows:-.
-
Opposite party's ld. counsel suddenly deviated from pleadings and amended pleadings and also made new facts or gave new explanation of new facts to court, during closing arguments on an Interim Application.
-
My lawyer didn't immediately raised objection right there at that moment and also missed to address it during the closing argument of my side (respondent)
-
And order is passed in favour of the opposite party.
- Is it allowed to interrupt oral argument of the opposite cousel, right there, like in a debate?
Please let me know.