Good morning...
Can any expert kndly explain the meaning and significance of the following judgment by addl dist / family court (or whatever the designnations there. its confusing)?
Applicant-husband/father submitted the application (1 page)
It contained complaints as 'There are mistakes in roznama. Kindly either correct or reject roznama. Applicant is shown absent on two hearings wrongly. He was present.'
It also contained complaint as 'Court is just sitting IDLE on the applicant's application as 'filed' by avoiding to take any futher stages like 'other side to say' and hearing and judgment etc. Application is for 'take kids (2 boys, school going) to vacation trip after exams, as visitation proceedings also pending'.
Court gave following judgment on above 1 paged application within 40 seconds!!!!
Judgment:-- "Prayer not tenable and hence application is liable to be rejected'
Thats all (copy wasn't given to opponent lawyer. there is mention of 'other side to say'.)
I have read that 'Court judgement is supposed to mention the reasons for decision.'
Also above judgment is written on the left margin of the Application
Xerox copy which meant for the opponent was returned back to the applicant.
Confusion is that:
Question:- Does rejection also mean that 'it is dismissed for lack of merits?'.
Question:- Is above judgment appealable?
Question:- Why a new application may not be valid if applicant files the same above in HC now? Does that mean now it is res judicat (issue already decided)? Does that mean that now only appeal is valid?
Question:- Does that mean that now the applicant is legally not allowed to file a fresh application (in very soft words offcourse) in HC?
Please advise.
Even boys want to enjoy the vacation trip. But if court doesn't move and just sits on pile of Apps how is it possible?