Can court grant stay of strikes?

James Martine Vs. State of Kerela { 2004 (1)KLT 513 (SC) }

Wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court held as follows:

 "19. Before we part with the case it needs to be noted that in the 
name of hartal or bandh or strike no person  has any right to cause 
inconvenience to any other person or to cause in any manner a 
threat or apprehension of risk to life, liberty, property of any citizen or 
destruction of life and property, and the least any Government or 
public property. It is high time that the authorities concerned take 
serious note of this requirement while dealing with those who 
destroy public property in the name of strike, hartal or bandh.
 Those who at times may have even genuine demands to make 
should not loose sight of the overall situation eluding control 
and reaching unmanageable bounds endangering life, liberty 
and property of citizens and public, enabling anti-social forces 
to gain control resulting in all around destruction with counter 
productive results at the expense of public order and public 
peace. No person has any right to destroy another's property 
in the guise of bandh or hartal or strike, irrespective of the 
proclaimed reasonableness  of the cause or the question whether
there is or was any legal sanction for the same. The case at hand 
is one which led to the destruction of property and loss of lives, 
because of irresponsible and illegal acts of some in the name of 
bandh or hartal or strike. Unless those who organize can be confident
of enforcing effective control over any possible turn of events, they 
should think twice to hazard themselves to such risk prone ventures 
endangering public peace and public order. The question whether
bandh or hartal or strike has any legal sanctity is of little consequence
in such matters. All the more so when the days are such where even 
law enforcing authorities/those in power also precipitate to gain 
political advantage at  the risk and cost of their opponents. Unless 
such acts are controlled with iron hands, innocent citizens are 
bound to suffer and they shall be the victims of the high-handed 
acts of some fanatics with queer notions of democracy and
freedom of speech or association.  That provides for no license 
to take law into their own hands. Any soft or lenient approach for 
such offenders  would be an affront to rule of law and challenge 
to public order and peace."

And, kindly go through the attached file.