Sec.59 reads that : Without prejjudice to the provisions of Sec.58 the Chief Commissioner may of his own motion or on the application of any aggrieved person or otherwise look in to complaints with respect to matters relating to: [a] dedprivation of rights of persons with disabilities.
[b] non-implimentation of laws,rules,bye-laws,regulations,executive orders,guidelines or instructions made or issued by the appropriate government and the local authorities for the welfare and protection of rights or persons with disabilities, and take up the matter with the appropriate authorities.
but in my case Dy.Director General, Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment Govt.Of India, New Delhi had directed his ministry Director to investigate the matter and do accordingly, therefore Director, Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment, Govt.of India instructed through his official e-mail id to the concerned bank and banking department to considere the same i.e. promote the person who complained, but no-one is agreed this before we approaching the high court,due to mis-leading our advocate perhaps not placed this e-mail instruction in the high court, hence the writ petition soughted to touch under sec.59. My advocate further dis-agree that the e-mail sent by ministry is not an executive order or instructions, but as per my knowledge Dy.Director General and Director of a concerned ministry is comes under executives, also the above director himself confirms that his e-mail was an instruction to the bank, therefore i have evidence under sec.59[b], can i file writ appeal under this evidence. As chief commissioner for disasbilities not interest to intervene in the case even he has instructed to take action against the respondent bank.
Hence please guide me further, whether the e-mail be an evidence to me for filing writ appeal before high court.
