On section 65/66 ita 2000

Section 65 and 66 of Information Tech.act  is bailable, if the FIR INCLUDES 419 and 420 it becomes non bailable and cognizable offence.

one amendment to my previous query,

the charge was brought u/s 66a n 66c of ITA 2000.From the papers of complaint it is clear that the charge is false.Now what should the person do as he is a govt employee .these sections of RTA 2000 are bailable or non-bailable ?the complaint was lodged in local police station of the business concern.

kindly reply.urgent.

As stated mail all details at info@cyberorgindia.com for advice.

dear  guest,

i run a company..my employee left organisation and didnt return laptop and phone having information..He also mailed other employees of company blaming comp that comp dint follow policies and procedures..can v do something on this aso

i beg pls help

dear  guest,

i run a company..my employee left organisation and didnt return laptop and phone having information..He also mailed other employees of company blaming comp that comp dint follow policies and procedures..can v do something on this aso

i beg pls help

Dear S De

the offence u/s 65/66 of ITA is cognizable, non-bailable and triable by magistrate of First Class/JM/MM.

in section 65 shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years or with fine which may extend upto Two Lakh rupees or both and u/s 66 shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years or with fine which may extend upto five Lakh rupees or both

file a complaint under section 379,406 and 500 of IPC,punishement for theft, criminal breach of trust and punishment for making defamatory remarks about the company.