@ Author
1. Current position (HAMA)
Section 7 : Capacity of a male Hindu to take in adoption - - 'any male Hindu who is of sound mind and is not a minor has the capacity to take a son or a daughter in adoption provided that, if he has a wife living, he shall not adopt except with the consent of his wife unless the wife has completely and finally renounced that world, or has ceased to be a Hindu, or has been declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be of unsound mind.
2. Amendment proposed by feminists lobby and got struck in first round of parliament debate for want of agreement with Mens Right Activits group proposals
Section 7 : Capacity of a Hindu to take in adoption - 'Any person who is a Hindu of sound mind and I not a minor has the capacity to take a son or a daughter in adoption': - 'Provided that, if he/she has a spouse living, he/she shall not adopt except with the consent of his/her spouse unless the spouse has completely and finally renounced the world or has ceased to be a Hindu or has been declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be of un sound mind'. (A female Hindu who is married and whose husband becomes incapacitated and if she chooses not to re-marry, she would remain a member of her husband's family. If she desired to make an adoption, the adopted child must be related to the husband of the female making the adoption.' The Explanation of this section shall be deleted.
Justification for change given by feminists
Section 7: Capacity of a Hindu to take in adoption - These changes would ensure a safer home for the child to be adopted. A female Hindu who is married and whose husband becomes incapacitated, if chooses, not to remarry, she would remain a member of the family of her husband. If she desires to make an adoption the adopted child must be ensured full relationship in the family of his adoption and such a child must be related to the husband of the female making the adoption. This would be in consonance to the words and sprit of the Act.
As practice of bigamy is prohibited under the Hindu Marriage Act, hence this section has no meaning in present situation :-)
Proviso places a restriction as concerned to right to take in adoption that makes the consent of the wife a necessity so as to make the adoption valid. The consent must be obtained prior to the civil adoption takes place and not later on where the proviso is disregarded adoption is not valid. See re. Badrilal vs. Bheru 1986 (1) HLR 81.
In the case of divorce the consent is not necessary but in the case of judicial separation, consent would be necessary. In case of two wives, consent must be of both the wives despite the fact that one of them was not living under the same roof for a big job of twenty or thirty years. See re. Bhooloo Ram vs. Ram Lal 1989 (2) HLR 162
Now see yourself where husbands missing there child during divorce proceedings stand as of today against per se kidnapped child with mother enjoying two fruits (litigation and company of child)!
[Bad gender biased laws na !]