LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

JAGMOHAN (COMPANY SECRETARY)     10 January 2009

Buying of roof rights in Delhi

if somebody buy (through POA and will) a roof right of the first floor of the building in Delhi and construct second floor. And there is nothing in the documents about the the matter that to whom the roof of the second floor will belong.

in such a case ...if ....both parties arise the dispute by claiming the roof right of a second floor then... to whom it will legally belong.....

 

Please explain 

 



Learning

 7 Replies

H. S. Thukral (Lawyer)     10 January 2009

Terms of the agreement shall have to be interpretted.  

JAGMOHAN (COMPANY SECRETARY)     12 January 2009

in the agreemnt and will the terms is return as


i (seller) hereby transfer my all rights on and above the roof of first floor to ...............

H. S. Thukral (Lawyer)     12 January 2009

Im my opinion the buyer can construct the 2nd Floor. That is being folowed in Delhi in sale agreements of this kind.  

JAGMOHAN (COMPANY SECRETARY)     12 January 2009

Dear Mr. Thukral


the dispute is not related to the constructuion of second floor...


the dispute is related to the point that to whom the roof of the second floor will belong...


because the seller is claiming that in any case the top roof will belong to him

H. S. Thukral (Lawyer)     12 January 2009

Whether the roof or the construction there on, if all rights of the terrace have been sold, the buyer should be the owner. As I earlier said, that is a practice being followed.

JAGMOHAN (COMPANY SECRETARY)     13 January 2009

thanks for your reply..


 can you please forward me any judicial pronouncement in this reference..


 


 

javed (TRADE)     01 July 2011

Hi Harbhajan Ji,

Your valuable advice is sought on the matter detailed below:

A Top floor Flat build by a developer/ builder is purchased by a person ALONG WITH its Roof Right in 2002. Other floors of the building had already been purchased by different persons before the sale of Top Floor Flat by the Building Owner.

Water Tanks of all the Flats of the building are placed at the roof top of the Top Floor owner. The Registered Deeds of all other Flat Owners contain the provision that they would be free to have access to the roof for the purpose of maintenance of their water tanks. BUT no staircase exists o go to the roof top and there is no other way to go to the roof top except through the sitting room of the Top Floor Owner by placing a ladder.

But on the purchase of the top floor by the person no fresh agreement was entered in to by any of the lower Flat Owners for making any access to the roof top. Privacy of the Top Floor Owner is frequently violated not only by other Flat Owners, but also by plumbers hired by them from time to time.

Due to unrestricted overflow of water from water tanks of other Flat Owners on account of excessive boosting by their booster pumps, the ceiling of two rooms of the Top Floor started leaking and dripping of seeped water from place to place causing much damage to the furniture and accessories, etc. When asked to share the cost of repair of the roof, every other Flat Owner declined to share any expenses. Not only the roof had to be repaired extensively, waterproofed, and paved, but also expenditure had to be incurred for removal and reinstallation of their water tanks, including bearing of the cost of other accessories used in reinstallation. But none bothered to share even a single paisa for all that. But when the Ground Floor Owner reconstructed the platform in front of the entrance of the building and another platform at the backside of the building, which only for the use of the Ground Floor Owner, made the Top Floor Owner to share the expenditure with him.

Again when some water supply pipeline was considered to have been damaged, he wanted the top floor owner to share the cost even for reconstruction of the platform of the backside of the building, which is solely used by the Ground Floor Owner. When reminded that nobody shared any expenditure with me for the repair of the roof top damaged extensively by the constant water overflow from the water, his pat reply was that the liability rested with the person having the Roof Right. On reminding that they and their plumbers also approach to roof top, his pat reply was he had the right to go to the roof top since his water tank is placed there.

So, my QUERIES to the Experts are:

(1) Whether, the other Flat Owners are not obliged to enter in to a fresh agreement with the top floor owner, as the roof right rests with him only, and the original building owner and developer has already sold he roof rights to the Top Floor Owner? If so under which section of which Act of law?

(2) Whether the Other Floor Owners have the right to go to the roof top through the private property of the Top Floor Owner? If so, under which section of which Act of law?

(3) Whether, the Top Floor Owner is obliged to provide access to the roof top to the other floor owners even through his private property? If so, under which section of which Act of law?

(4) Whether the Owner with roof rights can charge any rent or license fee from the other floor owners for the space being used by them for placing and maintenance of their water tanks at the roof top? If so, under which section of which Act of law?

Experts may kindly like to lend their valuable advice to sort out the aforesaid matter.

With best regards

 


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register