Complaint on the basis of a Photocopy of an agreement
What is the value of a Photocopy of a document (agreement), the original of which is not in existence, and which is denied ever being executed by one of the parties (the accussed) ?
What is the implication in a case u/s 138 NIA is filed by the complainant claiming recovery of an amount based on such a document ? The accused denies to have executed that document even though the copy of his signatures seem to have been transposed/superimposed there?
