If you were to be cross examined by other party then immediately you should have said that, other party seems to have no objection and seems to have waived the right to cross exam me.
If other party sleeps, slumbers on own rights you can't punished due to laches by other party.
You should have strongly opposed the adjournment. Even now take the matter on board showing urgency and make above plea.
This is sheer delaying tactic.
This is legitimate expectation, a person is always vigilant to anything that might adversely affect to its own interest. other party is so cool on this front, then it is to be assumed that other party hardly has any objection to your oral evidence.
Period.
They must have given some genuine reasons or some personal inconvenience etc to which court does grant adjournment, otherwise not.
Check your lawyer also. He would have taken money from you even though nothing happened on previous hearings. Why shouldn't he? You are the one who has to find remedy to it. its your pocket and time that is getting consumed.
Actually you have enlightened me also on some other things!!!
Thanks!!