Fake date of marriage

The posting is a riddle than a query.

1. There is no perjury on her part or on her action except it can be treated as a fraudulent act.

2. Unless the interested parties to that marrige or a victim of that marriage is filing a criminal case on this, however it may be noted that both the parties to the mariage have indulged into this fraudulent act of faking or manipulating the date of marriage to play fraud on court, hence it is another fradulent act.

3. The first marriage was dissolved by an order of court hence it would be pertinent to establish that the previous marriage was fraudulently dissolved subsequent to that the aggrieved party to this marraige can raise this issue, but how far he will be able to have a favorable judgment because fraud is different to that of the second marriage which was as per law solemnised after dissolution of the previous marriage.

Therefore the burden to prove that the previous marriage was frauulently dissolved hence the dissolution is null and void and accordingly the marriage contracted subsequently becomes null and void. 

No purjury.

It is not a real time problem / dispute but a moot court topic.

Even I have the same doubt this may not be an actual problem but a moot court issue.

The querist may discuss with his teacher and choose a better answer academically.

the above quary is real

If it was a realy query nothing prevents you from posting the proper details, becuase your own contents are contradicting each other.