Urgent Help would be appreciated!!..
Can Caveat be filed in the District Courts?
Kindly let me know about caveat.....Whether it is required for the Respondent to file a caveat in the following scenario? FC/District court....Is there register maintained to give formal warning to Petitioner about Respondent's likely moves that he is comtemplating on filing cases against Petitioner such as ........................
A) 'Tax Evasion by the Petitioner' and likely enquiry by the Income tax department after Respondent makes a formal complaint about it.
B) 'Perjury committed by the Petitioner'and likely judicial enquiry about criminal offences as per ICP Sec 182..IPC 194.....after Respondent makes a formal complaint about it:
There are Concrete instances of
- lying on oath (Wife working and right from 1st day states on oath that she was unemployed. she changes her stand after being exposed about her employment...which is treated as 'after thought')
- concealing material facts
- fabricating false evidence
- approaching judiciary with unclean hands
- stating a lies in front of court during arguments also, convenient to her stand, about facts which has been recorded in the 'order' passed by the Hon. Court.
The Husband/Respondnet has material proofs of all the above!!!
FC passed an order against respondent-husband onsec 24 int. maint. app. filed by petitioner-wife in a divorce case............. ..The Respondent prefers to go for 'review' , first at the trial Court only i.e. the Family Court!!, else would go to HC.
The Respondent has material proofs which he could not submit in front of Court initially during hearing of maint app. (and rather Respondent misjudged his wife's 'capability of lying on oath' about facts (which are very simple to extract...... in the era of IT and computerisation of banks and with a simple PAN number whole info can be obtained!!!!)..........in front of Hon. Court as well as startling disclosures about wife's lies!!)
Please suggest.......
this a good case where......................................... husband is really innocent and wife behaved recklessly...and the message has to be given to society that ......under the disguise of 'weaker gender' one can not misuse the provisions of law!!!
HC always like to take oppotunity to find mistakes of trial court......but the Respondent prefers to go for review at the trial court first and not directly to HC!!!
