I am Srinivasane, living in UT of Puducherry. I am posting a query which I is happening in my family case. My maternal grandfather holds a piece of land which he got the rights of succession from his father. During my great grand father period, there has been a dispute case against a family who are saying that they also owned that peice of land.
They have used 4 person for this as proof with birth and death certificate. From now I will mention A for my family side and B for the opponent side.
A has two person, one is Sabapathy(great grand father of my great grand father) and Thayalnayagi(my maternal aunt)
B has two person of the same name of which Sabapathy is kept for the opponent(who currently representing them) and Thayalnayagi (opponents great grand mother).
B, that is the opponent's lawyer has used this point to link both family are of same hierarchy by using the dead certificates and birth certificates details and the names were kept for remembering the ancestor. For which the Justice also gave 1:1 share for the cases.
We have reappealed the case..
my question is
1) Property tax will be issued only to owner doesnt have their name and it has only names of A family.
2) how can the justice be given by using names as a proof, however there are many srinivasane in India. So all Srinivasane will be of same hierarchy.
3) I am going to demand for DNA test, to prove the hierarchy. It can be done ?
4) My family has been paying property tax and other taxes for 150 years, how can the justice can grant 1:1 verdict over the case. Moreover, my maternal side have said my great grand father was eldest son in his family. Does the eldest son can acquire most perctange of the share?
5) Is there any loophole to break this 1:1 case?
Please respond me :)
