Handwriting expert can prove the handwriting.

if accused not accpet than handwritten expert chek those all and prove it 

 Dear Sir,                                                              06/01/2017                                           

The same case is with me but it is a family matter in Ahmedabad 

Can anybody suggest the name, contact number and address of any handwriting expert who is residing or working in AHMEDABAD

Regards

You must have other circumstantial evidence to prove the writting otherwise mere expert opinion has no meaning.

Expert opinion(SFL) must be corroberated by Evidence

The posting is unconvincing. NI 138 is a criminal proceedings. There is no  question of the complainant confronting the accused. What do you mean by "further chief"?

Evidence of an expert is not a substantive piece of evidence. The courts do not consider it conclusive. Without independent and reliable corroboration it may have no value in the eye of law. Expert evidence is opinion evidence and it can’t take the place of substantive evidence. It is a rule of procedure that expert evidence must be corroborated either by clear direct evidence or by circumstantial evidence.

Thanks all for the suggestion. The cheque involves very high amount so we are trying to corner the accused from every side. Yes. accused did admit that he had re-paid some amount to complainant. Immediately they took another different stand and till this time they have presented 4 different versions why they have re-paid the amount. For us, strong evidence is that hand-written document which nails case and it corroborates the payment re-paid and circumstantial evidence. Thax. CHETHAN