Cheque bounce is a stiff law and most of the accused get convicted since no proper defense is taken at trial stage. Once time goes out nothing can be done. Cases which could have been won easily are lost since courts acts on evidence. And accused fail to contradict the evidence of the complainant which is other wise easy and simple.
We will give details of certain recent higher courts judgments to educate the accused so that they can take proper steps at lower court level.
27. The petitioner did not lead any evidence. On the contrary, in his 313 statement he has taken a plea which is not at all convincing. It appears rather strange that he issued a cheque in the name of the complainant/respondent No.1
28. Thus, the presumption of a legally enforceable debt could not be rebutted by the petitioner.
. There is no reason to interfere with the concurrent judgments of the Courts below.
