The Supreme Court in its advisory jurisdiction in Reference No. 1/2006
U/A 317 (I) of the Constitution of India, CPSC, has opined as under:
“ In our opinion, there is no evidence of proved misbehaviour against Shri Ashok Darbari. Hence, reference is answered in negative and it is deemed that he should have continued in his office till the time his appointment might ordinarily had come to an end. As a result, he should be given all pecuniary benefits which would have been due to him but for the suspension. The reference stands answered accordingly.”
The question is- whether the president of