A man videotapes his wife beating him and his son too to seek a divorce.
Dont you think we should not take it at face value.
Since the man knew where the camera was, he could have easily manipulated the camera to his benefit.
He could have easily provoked his wife at a distance away from the camera.
Out of sheer provocation, she would have hit him.
If the camera was all over the house without the couple's knowledge, and then he was beaten, then there is some kind of truth in it.
I think this evidence should not be admitted in court.