My chequebook was stolen with malafide intent. To close the loop after forging the cheques and to be able to file a 138 complaint against me, the complainant invented a huge friendly/hand loan as being given to me. My question is on the approach to take so that the complainant first has to prove the existence of a legally enforceable liability. What evidence will he have to give to prove a hand loan and what can I do to force him to give that evidence if it exists? I want to do this upfront at the very beginning of the case. I want to prove upfront that he was never financially capable of even dreaming of giving me hand loan of several lakhs, leave aside actually giving me such ahuge amount. The story of loan was invented after my cheques were stolen and he backdated the loan story several years and claims to have post dated cheques with him.
