LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More


(Guest)

When filling up of blank cheque will not amounts to material

When filling up of blank Cheque will not amounts to Material Alteration in case of dishonour of cheque?

 

 With regard to the instruments other than a cheque, an implied
authority is given to the holder at the time of entrusting it to fill up the
same. There may be instances where an implied authority is given to the
person, at the time of entrusting a signed blank cheque containing the
signature of the drawer of the cheque, to fill the columns therein.
 If   a   principal   or   employer   deputes   his   agent   or   employee   to
purchase an article and if the dealer fills up that signed blank cheque
leaf showing the exact amount covered by the bill showing the price of
the article sold then it cannot be said that what was handed over by the
drawer of the cheque is only a signed blank cheque leaf. In such cases an
implied authority to the trader/seller of the article to fill up the cheque
leaf can certainly be inferred. Similarly, there may also be cases where at
the time of settlement of the accounts, a particular amount was found
payable by the drawer of the cheque to the other party and if a signed
blank cheque entrusted to be filled up later is filled up in tune with the
accounts,   showing   the   actual   amount   payable   by   the   drawer   of   the
cheque to the other party, then also it can be said that there was the
implied authority to fill up the signed blank cheque leaf. There may be
such instances where the sum is ascertainable and the signed blank
cheque leaf is given to fill up the same after ascertaining the same. In
such cases there would be no difficulty to infer an implied authority
given by the drawer. Simply because the cheque is seen filled up or
written   in   the   hand   writing   of   another   person   it   cannot   lead   to   a
conclusion that only a signed blank cheque leaf was given. The person
signing the cheque may have difficulty due to many reasons to write the
cheque and it might have been filled up by the payee or by another. In
such cases it cannot be said that what was handed over was only a
signed blank cheque leaf. In all such cases the ultimate conclusion may
depend   upon   the   proof   of   the   transaction   and   execution   of   the
instrument. It must also be held that when it is a case that only a signed
blank   leaf   was   handed   over   by   the   accused,   then   he   must   offer
satisfactory explanation as to the circumstances under which the signed
blank cheque happened to be handed over. Considering the totality of

the evidence and circumstances, it is for the court to draw the inference
as to whether it was given with an implied authority to fill up the same
showing the amount ascertained or ascertainable to discharge the debt
or liability. Therefore, there may be such cases where implied authority
can be inferred. But the contention that when a signed blank cheque leaf
is handed over, it can never be filled up and that if it is filled up it would
amount to a material alteration within the meaning of using Section 87
of   the   N.I.   Act,   does   not   stand   to   rhyme   or   reason.   Similarly,   the
contention that  Section 20 of the N.I. Act is applicable to an unfilled or
blank cheque leaf also cannot be accepted. It would depend upon the
facts of each case. Therefore, it is neither a case which attracts Section
87 of the N.I. Act nor is it a case where the complainant can rely upon
Section 20 of the N.I. Act and contend that as a signed blank cheque leaf
is given it gives an authority to fill up the same according to the whim
and fancy of the payee. [See : P. Purushothaman Nair v. K. Sreekantan
Nair, 2013 (4) ILR (Ker) 115]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR QUASHING & SET ASIDE FIR/ORDER)
NO. 968 of 2014


NIKHIL P GANDHI....Applicant(s)
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & 2....Respondent(s)
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA
Date : 15/06/2016

https://www.lawweb.in/2016/06/when-filling-up-of-blank-cheque-will.html



Learning

 3 Replies

LAXMINARAYAN - Sr Advocate. ( solve problems in criminal cases. lawproblems@gmail.com)     23 June 2016

Very good judgment but ultimately it hold that once signature is admitted there is implied authority to fill in by any body.that payee or holder.

Shekhar (Proprietor)     27 June 2016

Laxminarayan sir, just admitting the signature, means there is implied authority to fill the cheque? If cheque is filled by complainant, does it mean he has implied authority?

LAXMINARAYAN - Sr Advocate. ( solve problems in criminal cases. lawproblems@gmail.com)     28 June 2016

Pl read the judgment completely, it has discussed various erlier judgments and and has come to conclusison that :-

 

 

b a r e r e a d i n g o f S e c t i o n 2 0 o f t h e N e g o t i a b l e I n s t r u m e n t s A c t w o u l d g o t o s h o w t h a t i t w o u l d a p p l y o n l y t o a s t a m p e d

instrument viz., pronote and bill of exchange and not to the cheques. Therefore, Section 20 will

have no application to the cheques issued after signing by the drawer.

 

 It has been f u r t h e r  o b s e r v e d  t h e r e  i n     a s   f o l l o w s : −

 

" . . . . t h e r e  i s  n o  l a w  w h i c h  p r e s c r i b e s   t h a t   a   c h e q u e   s h a l l  b e  f i l l e d  u p   b y   t h e  d r a w e r   h i m s e l f . I f s u c h p r o p o s i t i o n i s a c c e p t e d , n o  u n l e t t e r e d p e r s o n , w h o k n o w s o n l y t o s i g n h i s n a m e , c a n  n e v e r b e  a  d r a w e r o f a c h e q u e .

 

 F u r t h e r , a p e r s o n  w h o  i s  p h y s i c a l l y    i n c a p a c i t a t e d    t o  f i l l u p   t h e c h e q u e  c a n  n o t   a l so  d r a w  a  c h e q u e   a n d   n e g o t i a t e    i t .

 


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register