Who is the real politician in your house?

Very good article.

Leader

This is called Ghar ki  Rajneeti,

 the process Active, and pasive(hearing)

Order and followers.

It starts from the home and ends in a court.In a home it is heared by neighbours,in a court it is known by all to the society,drama starts from the home and noticeable to public when it comes to courts.

For happy relationship,no politics but only equality (they should understand to eachother) Right to equality article 14.

One interesting news you just read it;

Info;https://www.sify.com/news/wealthy-wife-ordered-to-pay-maintenance-to-husband-news-national-ld5vEgifhii.html

New Delhi, March 31 (IANS) Invoking the principle of gender equality, the Delhi High Court Thursday upheld a lower court order asking a woman, who runs a business with an annual turnover of about Rs.1 crore, to pay monthly maintenance of Rs.20,000 to her estranged, unemployed husband.

Justice G.S. Sistani upheld the trial court order of 2009 that awarded maintenance to Rajeev (name changed).

'He should also enjoy the same status as his wife,' Justice Sistani said.

He directed Priya (name changed) to pay Rs.20,000 per month to Rajeev, in addition to a Maruti Zen Car.

'Law is equal for both of them. When husband is unemployed then the wife, who is working, should maintain him,' said the court.

Priya had challenged the trial court order, saying a monthly payment of Rs.20,000 was on the higher side.

The couple married in 1982 and have a son and a daughter aged 26 and 24 years respectively.

Rajeev's lawyer Bhupendra Pratap Singh has alleged that Priya and his children threw his client out of their home in 2006 after accusing him of having an affair with another woman.

'The court also rejected Priya's plea that as she was already looking after their children, she should be exempted from paying her husband a monthly maintenance,' Singh said.

The court considered Priya's flourishing business of a hotel cum paying guest in Greater Noida while fixing the maintenance.

Singh said Rajeev had purchased the hotel in his wife's name.

'Priya tactfully named herself as the first party in the business and property and threw him out after levelling baseless accusations,' he said.

Rajeev had filed for divorce in 2008 in the trial court on the grounds of desertion. He later filed a maintenance plea under section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act.

Thanks for praising.

Please avoid these news here,as they will confuse the reader further,and this news will also transform this thread into personal attacks.

The issue I raised above requires observation of relationships within a family,& a great degree of psychological analysis,but this news will divert the issue elsewhere.People may forget what the thread was actually about and start discussing irrelevant things.

I hope you take my words in the right spirits.

Best Wishes.

Respected Madam,

May be your advocating the newly wedded wife . but I strongly disagree on this version stted by you

If MIL is cunning,clever,dominating,liar type,etc. generally her son,relatives,other daughter inlaws,etc will believe whatever she says/does against the daughter inlaw.

The husband living in joint family will always tried to maintain the balance with wife and his mother. He doesn't want that her wife ruled over her motherin law. Its also the obligation of the wife to maintain cordial raltions with family members when such wife moves to her own parents and she expect her sister-in law to mainatain corrdination with her own parents

Women are more like an advocates who when represent the case of Govt favors the policies made by the Govt and when contest on the behalf of petitioner( and against govt) condemn the policies made by Govt

But Advocates contest the cases only in courts and matrimonial home and loint families are not the court to contest

@ Anonymous:

Kindly do not repeat your posts in all my threads.I have already replied to you,in response to your above post.However since you may confuse people here also,let me reply again:

You are totally wrong.I am not advocating any daughter inlaw  here.I think you ignored my lines above,which I reproduce again:

If the wife is really cunning,clever etc with inlaws which the men often complain,will she not succeed in turning her husband,his relatives,her kids and in fact just everyone against inlaws?

Will she not succeed in turning the husband into her favour,or better still,in making him a slave?

Such wives will even send the inlaws in an old aged home,if they don't own a home.

I also wrote about victimsed employees:

"In an office,an honest man will be easily thrown out of job not because of his performance,but because of the complaints made by  his jealous,"powerful" colleagues.

However these same loud mouthed,jealous colleagues will be retained,rather promoted because of recommendations of all his "chamcha" colleagues,who got attracted to his power." 

Finally this is what I wrote,which shows I was not favouring a mother inlaw:

So all those husbands/sons out there....Kindly observe this phenomenon in your family,as to who gets max. support easily,and against whgom everyone gangs up.

This will help you to determine who the actual victim is,and who's acting like a "victim".

I think you are extremely hateful of wives.So you do not even read properly what I wrote,and keep thinking on the same lines that the husband balances,the husband does this,husband does that etc.Please do not repeat your same "ghisa pita tape" in each and every thread.First undertand what is being said.

I am telling the husbands/sons to observe people in their homes and differetiate b/w victims and abusers.I am not asking them to balance,do this for the wife,do that for the wife,etc.

If you still cannot understand my message,I can't explain any further.