Held, FIR didn't suggested that there was such a fierce enmity between the accused and the deceased persons or even Malati (accused's wife) - Accused might be having strained relationship with the wife and her parents but it is clear that he was on visiting terms with them and thus the strained relationship was not of such fierce nature that the accused would go to the extent of committing murder of both the parents-in-law - Factor of enmity relied upon by the Courts below non justified - Blood-stained clothes of the accused, of no consequence as the clothes of the accused were never sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory - Even the presence of the accused in the house not proved- Presence of the accused in the village by itself cannot amount to an incriminating circumstance - Thus, in the present case all the alleged incriminating circumstances could not be said to have been established - It is found that the circumstances could not point out towards the guilt of the accused, without any other inference being probable, the accused must get the benefit of doubt - Appeal allowed
