Held, The word `communication' has not been defined in the Act and the Rules and thus it has to be interpreted by applying the rule of contextual interpretation and the relevant provisions. Rule 94(2) provides that once the factum of pronouncement of Order by the Tribunal is made known to the parties and they are given opportunity to obtain a copy thereof through e-mail etc., the Order will be deemed to have been communicated to the parties and the period of 60 days specified in the main part of Section 125 will commence from that date. In the present case, the date on which the impugned order was pronounced by the Tribunal, the factum of pronouncement was conveyed to the parties including the Appellant. The preparation of appeal is a clinching evidence of the fact that the Appellant had not only become aware of the order of the Tribunal, but had obtained copy thereof. No tangible explanation was offered by Appellant for not filing Appeal for more than three and half months after its preparation. Thus, appeal cannot be entertained and hence is dismissed.
