LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Amar Nath Roy & Others Versus Arun Kumar Kedia & Another

Guest ,
  17 May 2011       Share Bookmark

Court :
SC
Brief :
November 04, 2009 and we gave the tenant nine months' time from that date to vacate the premises in question. Review Petition filed by the tenant was also dismissed on March 25, 2010.
Citation :
Amar Nath Roy & Others Versus Arun Kumar Kedia & Another

 

REPORTABLE

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

 

CONTEMPT PETITION(C) NO.139/2011

IN

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2663 OF 2004

 

Amar Nath Roy & Others ..Petitioners

versus

Arun Kumar Kedia & Another ..Respondents

 

O R D E R

 

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

 

In this case, the tenant's appeal being Civil Appeal No. 2663 of 2004 was dismissed by this Court by our order dated November 04, 2009 and we gave the tenant nine months' time from that date to vacate the premises in question.  Review Petition filed by the tenant was also dismissed on March 25, 2010.

 

We are informed that the tenant has not vacated the premises in question. Hence, this contempt petition.

 

Accordingly, we direct that the tenant-Anderson Wright & Co. shall be evicted from 7, Red Cross Place, P.S. Hare Street, Kolkata-700 001 forthwith by police force.

 

The Contempt Petition is disposed of.

 

 

............................J.

[MARKANDEY KATJU]

NEW DELHI;                                                                                                ............................J.

MAY 13, 2011                                                                                                [GYAN SUDHA MISRA]

 
"Loved reading this piece by Guest?
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"



Published in Others
Views : 2419




Comments