Whather 138 Attract in case : Account closed by Bank..
Challenge against conviction on the ground that previous sanction to prosecute the Appellant was not legally obtained as required under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ..
Extent of power vested in the Government in reviewing its order granting or refusing sanction to prosecute the public servant in terms of Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. ..
The prosecution in support of its case, relied primarily on the evidence of Dr. A.K. Dwivedi PW-1, who had conducted the post-mortem examination, Executive Magistrate-cum- Tahsildar Vir Bahadur Prasad PW-2, Ram Singh, Advocate, PW-5, Mujur PW-6 and D..
The prosecution in support of its case relied primarily on the evidence of PW1 Prem Pal, PW-5 Kalu and PW-6 Jagdish, PW-2 Dr. M.K.Goel, who had conducted the autopsy on the dead body, and of PW-7 Sub-Inspector Hari Raj Singh, the main investigating o..
The prosecution in support of its case, examined three eye witnesses, Sharafat Husain PW-1, Firasat Husain PW-2 and Summeri PW-3, Dr. J.N. Bhargava, PW-4 who had examined Firasat Husain for his injuries, Dr. K.S. Tiwari, PW- 5 who had conducted the a..
This judgment will dispose of Criminal Appeal Nos. 1071 of 2009, 1294 of 2009, 182-183 of 2010 and 97-98 of 2010. The facts have been taken from Criminal Appeal No.1071 of 2009...
This appeal is directed against the judgment of the Madras High Court, Madurai Bench dated 7th March, 2007 in Criminal Appeal (MD) No.821 of 1999 by which the High Court affirmed the conviction and sentence recorded by the learned Special Judge-cum-A..
The short but important question of law which falls for our determination in the present appeal is as to whether protection under Article 20(3) of the Constitution is available to the appellant, who though not an accused in the police case in which h..
Section 15(1) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971..
Brief facts which are necessary to dispose of this appeal are recapitulated as under: The appellant, who belongs to the Indian National Congress party (for short ‘Congress party’) is the alleged accused in this case. The case of the prosecution, as d..
Chirra Shantha (the deceased) had strained family relations with her husband’s brother, the appellant. There was a family dispute with regard to a property wherein the husband of the deceased and the appellant were residing and the appellant wanted h..
The petitioner has been convicted under Section 420 and Section 120B, IPC by the learned Magistrate. He filed an appeal challenging his conviction before the learned Sessions Judge. While his appeal was pending, he filed an application before the lea..
Yesterday (22-11-2010) we had passed an order in this case, but subsequently Ms. Kamini Jaiswal, whom we had requested to be Amicus Curiae in this case, informed us that the above order requires some modification. We agree with this submission, and a..
Issue notice to petitioner No.1 why his sentence be not enhanced to life sentence as awarded by the trial Court. Issue notice to the respondent-State regarding petitioner No.2...
Section 34 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 The Drugs And Cosmetics Act, 1940 Section 18 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 State Of Haryana vs Brij Lal Mittal & Ors on 30 April, 1998 Section 34 in The Drugs And Cosmetics Act, 1940..
Litigant has right to seek transfer of case: Bombay HC , i need this judgements can you give any one ..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
