"The net of law is spread so wide, No sinner from its sweep may hide. Its meshes are so fine and strong. They take in every child of wrong O wondrous web of mystery !" Big fish alone escape from thee !"..
It hardly needs reiteration that the statutory authorities are duty bound in law to ensure the security and custody of all such properties that may be seized or confiscated till the proceedings under SAFEMA are finally concluded. If it is subseque..
In the aforesaid circumstances, the application for substitution which is otherwise hopelessly time-barred is rejected’. Consequently, this appeal abates and is therefore dismissed. CA Nos. 928 and 1198 of 1991..
This appeal preferred under Section 19(1) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 is directed against the judgment dated 31st March, 2005 of the High Court of Calcutta in C.P.A.N. No. 1535 of 2003 whereby the appellant has been held to have committed cri..
Petitioners (accused 2 and 1 respectively) and three others were tried for an offence punishable under 304-B of Indian Penal Code (for short, ‘IPC’) relating to the death of Anju Rani, wife of accused No.1 – Jolly Singla. Accused No.2 (Reshma Devi) i..
SC ruling on Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act LEGAL DIGEST ..
Negotiable Instruments Act "147. Offences to be compoundable. - Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), every offence punishable under this Act shall be compoundable."..
Supreme Court Digest of Recent Cases..
The Powers- Of- Attorney Act, 1882 The General Clauses Act, 1897 Section 6 in The Powers- Of- Attorney Act, 1882 Section 2 in The Powers- Of- Attorney Act, 1882 Article 13(1) in The Constitution Of India 1949 Citedby 148 docs - [View All] Behra..
Non-compliance of mandatory requirements of Sections 42(2), 55 and 57 of the N.D.P.S. Act. ..
Deceased Chethana was daughter of Jwalnaiah and Smt. Radhamma. The parents of the deceased were residents of Bangalore. Marriage of deceased Chethana took place with the appellant in the year 1987. After marriage the deceased started residing at Bell..
The said FIR is a long document which has been filed by one Harshida Ben, widow of Deepakbhai Krishnalal Joshi. It is apparent from the said report that she was married to Deepakbhai Krishnalal Joshi serving in Ahmedabad Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. as ..
Facts and circumstances giving rise to this appeal are that accused (A1 to A7) and Harijana Ayyanna (hereinafter called as “deceased”) were residents of village G. Singavaram. On 8.2.1999 at about 7.30 PM, the deceased along with his wife Harijana Ay..
An extremely unusual order passed by the High Court has fallen for consideration in this appeal which has been filed on behalf of the appellant/complainant Virender Prasad Singh. The said order was passed on the basis of a petition filed by the respo..
. Whether by writing editorial, which was published in Excise Law Times dated 1.6.2009 with the title “CESTAT PRESIDENT SETS HOUSE IN ORDER – ANNUAL TRANSFERS FOR MEMBERS INTRODUCED – REGISTRY IN LINE”, the respondent violated the undertaking filed i..
This appeal has been filed by the two appellants challenging the judgment rendered by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Criminal Appeal No.226-DB of 2002 dated 18.5.2004. By the aforesaid judgment, the High Court has confirmed the judgment of t..
This appeal has been preferred against the Judgment and Order dated 13.02.2009 of the Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh in Criminal Misc. No. 4136 of 2003, wherein the First Information Report (for short, “FIR”) dated 23.07.2002 lodged by the..
Section 6 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 Section 4 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 The Indian Penal Code, 1860 Section 3 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 Section 419 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860..
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 Section 125 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 Section 127 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 The Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000..
This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 26.05.2008 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Criminal Petition No.2625 of 2004. Brief facts of the case are as under:- The appellant, who was one of the Directors of R.P..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
