Held, the Court said that there is no dispute that Petitioner was awarded contract of laying the roads. The work of laying roads was shifted to other area as per directions of the accused and he has carried out the other work for which he has received money. The investigation is under way and during investigation these contentions will have to be enquired into and ultimately it is for I.O. to form an opinion and file final report. Having regard to the fact that the custodial interrogation of the Petitioner is found necessary in the case, no such direction can be issued. Petition dismissed.
