Held, case of sub tenancy and/or unauthorized occupation can be inferred essentially from the admitted facts between the parties. Lack of transfer of tenancy rights in the name of the Petitioner's father and bifurcation of the premises by partition on the staircase, thereafter converting one unit into two etc shows that there is subtenancy. Learned Principal Judge of City Civil and Sessions Court, Mumbai has correctly appreciated the evidence and has given correct reasoning with regard to the issue. Impugned Order cannot be faulted and needs no interference. Petitioner has not discharged the burden of showing that the tenanted premises has not been subletted. Consequently, he is in authorized occupation. Writ Petition is dismissed
