LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

When provision of Section 31(2) would apply?

Raj Kumar Makkad ,
  27 November 2010       Share Bookmark

Court :
Supreme Court of India
Brief :
Exemption - Application of Rule 41 of West Bengal Sales Tax Rules, 1995, Rule 3(116) of Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 and Section 31 of the Act, 1994 - (i) Whether the Assessee was entitled to get the tax exemption under Rule 3(116) of Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941.
Citation :
Bhai Jaspal Singh And Anr. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and Ors.* (Supreme Court) (Decided on 22.10.2010) MANU/SC/0885/2010

Held, (i) In computing the valuation of plant and machinery, only the cost price/purchase price of the equipment invested by the Assessee had to be taken into account. Expression "investment" in plant and machinery was not subject to the impact of depreciation in the value of plant and machinery. Since Assessee's investment was more than 5 lacs before said period in question and since the investment continues to remain unchanged, Assessee was not entitled to exemption from payment of sales tax either under the Rules or under the notification.

(ii) Whether interest on tax can be charged only after quantification of tax liability by Assessing Officer.

(ii) Interest was compensatory in character and was imposed on an Assessee who  withheld payment of any tax as and when it is due and payable. Where tax due on the basis of the return has not been paid before the expiry of the last date of filing of such return, provision of Section 31(2) would apply to the recovery of such demand for the amount of tax due. Hence Assessee would be liable to pay interest even before quantification of tax liability.

 
"Loved reading this piece by Raj Kumar Makkad?
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"



Published in Taxation
Views : 1304




Comments