LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Workmen Compensation Act 1923

H. S. Thukral ,
  10 March 2009       Share Bookmark

Court :
Supreme Court
Brief :
The meaning of Accident during the course of employment
Citation :
Malikarjuna G. Hiremath vs Branch Manager, The Oriental Insurance Company Limited and Another Decided on 12-02-9
Malikarjuna G. Hiremath vs Branch Manager, The Oriental Insurance Company Limited and Another [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 12 Feb 2009]
Labour & Industrial Law - Workmen Compensation Act, 1923, s. 30(1) - Held, if the workman dies a natural death because of the disease which he was suffering or while suffering from a particular disease he dies of that disease as a result of wear and tear of the employment, no liability would be fixed upon the employer - An accident may lead to death but that an accident had taken place must be proved - Only because a death has taken place in course of employment will not amount to accident - It is the specific case of the claimants that on 30.11.2000 the deceased who was driving the vehicle on the direction of the insured had gone to Gurugunta from Siraguppa - There he had gone to a temple and was sitting on the steps of the pond in the temple and he slipped and fell into the water and died due to drowning - This is not sufficient to fasten liability on either the insurer or the insured
 
"Loved reading this piece by H. S. Thukral?
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"







Comments