Custody Of Children In India

Introduction

Both parents enjoy legal custody of their child in India. This means that the mother has the right to raise and care for the kid, as well as visitation rights. The father has equal rights to raise and care for his children, but he does not have visitation rights. The courts do not make custody decisions based on which parent is better qualified to care for the child. It would be a tie between both parents in this situation. This custody arrangement stems from society's perception of women as the weaker gender. They would rather grant mothers legal custody of their children because they believe mothers should care for youngsters while father’s work is to provide financial aid.

Indian courts are hesitant to make judgements about child custody and child welfare. In India, child custody is a state-by-state matter, hence each state has its own set of rules and regulations. Many people in India prefer joint custody versus solo custody. A parent is not required to share custody of their children, and custody can be shared or not. If the parents are unable to agree on joint or sole guardianship, the court will decide who will have full custody of their kid. If the parents cannot agree, the court will usually ask both of them what they want.

Governance of the child custodial law

In India, the custody of children in matrimonial disputes is governed by the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 and the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956. These laws apply to Hindus, Buddhists, Jains, and Sikhs, while the Guardians and Wards Act applies to all other religions.

Under the Guardians and Wards Act, the welfare of the child is the paramount consideration in determining custody. The court may award custody to either parent, or to a third party, depending on the circumstances of the case. In making its decision, the court may consider the age and sex of the child, the wishes of the child (if the child is of sufficient age and understanding), the conduct and character of the parties, and any other factor that it deems relevant.

Under the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, the father is the natural guardian of a male child, while the mother is the natural guardian of a female child. However, the mother can also be the natural guardian of a male child if the father has died or has abandoned the child. In the case of a divorce, the mother has the right to custody of a child under the age of five. For a child over the age of five, the court will determine custody based on the best interests of the child.

In determining the best interests of the child, the court may consider a variety of factors, including the financial and emotional support that each parent is able to provide, the living conditions of each parent, and the relationship of the child with each parent. The court may also consider the child's age, sex, and any special needs or circumstances that the child may have. It is important to note that custody decisions in India are not based on a "winner takes all" approach. Instead, the court may award joint custody, whereby both parents have legal responsibility for the child and share in the decision-making process. The court may also award sole custody to one parent, with the other parent being granted visitation rights.

In cases where the parents are unable to reach an agreement on custody, the court may appoint guardian ad litem (GAL) to represent the interests of the child. The GAL is typically a lawyer or social worker who is trained to advocate for the best interests of the child. The GAL will conduct an investigation and make recommendations to the court based on their findings. It is important for parents to remember that the custody of a child is not a matter of right, but rather a matter of the child's welfare. The court's primary concern is the well-being and best interests of the child, and the parents' rights are secondary. Therefore, it is essential for parents to work towards an amicable resolution of custody disputes in the best interests of the child, rather than focusing solely on their own desires or needs.

Below are some examples of cases involving custody of children in matrimonial disputes in India:

In the case of K. Srinivas v. K. Sunita, the Supreme Court of India held that the welfare of the child is the paramount consideration in determining custody. In this case, the mother was awarded custody of the child, as the court found that it was in the child's best interests to remain with the mother, who had been the primary caregiver and provided a stable and nurturing environment for the child.

In the case of Krishna Kumar v. Lata, the Supreme Court of India held that the custody of a child should not be treated as a reward or punishment for the parents. In this case, the mother was awarded custody of the child, as the court found that the father had neglected the child's emotional and educational needs.

Conclusion

India has a long history of familial ties and child care. Children are considered blessings from the mother and father in Indian culture. The concept of equally sharing parental obligations is strongly ingrained in our culture. When parents’ divorce, one of the most emotional and complicated concerns is child custody. As you may see, custody is primarily regulated by what the judges decide. There have been numerous issues involving the multiple religious laws and the uniform laws issued by the state. It makes no difference what position you take on the law. A child's future should not be jeopardised. Resolving numerous pieces of legislation is primarily concerned with the welfare of children and social security. Any legal difficulties must be addressed.

Learn the practical aspects of CrPC HERE, CPC HERE, IPC HERE, Evidence Act HERE, Family Laws HERE, DV Act HERE