Judgements

Case Laws : Brain Mapping Test.

1. Admissibility of report of brain mapping test-result of a scientific test will depend upon the authenticity.  Whether the brain mapping test is so developed that the report will have probative value so as to enable a court to place reliance thereupon, is a matter which would require further consideration, if and when the materials in support thereof was placed before the court.

2005AIR SCW 2215 .  2005(5) CR.L.J. SC 2533 SCC 46.

2. Under section 173(8) permissibility of brain mapping test where letter by uncle of diseased alleging involvement of wife of diseased in his murder was sent to Human Rights commission, however, no fresh crime was registeredaaginst her on the basis of any further facts and she was neither accused nor witnessed in any otherse, so the order of the magistrate to permittin to conduct brain mapping and lie detection test on her ws not held as proper

CR.L.J. PAGE 35 2007(NOC). BOMBAY 2006 AIR BOMBAY 102.

3. Admissibility of polygraph test as lie  detection test.  As there were other materials sufficient for holding conviction of accused No.2, the supreme Court refrained from going in to the question of admissibility as otherwise of the result of polygraph test in the present case.  2007(2) crimes Page 1 (SC)

4. Conduct of scientific tests like polygraph, Nacro anyalysis and brain mapping of accused, resorting to scientific tests not being amounted to breaking the silence of an accused by force do amount to testimonial compulsion as because unless such tests are conducted the investigating agency may not in a position to come out with clinching testimony against the accused. AIR 2006 SC 1267 /  2006 Cr.L.J. 1679 / 206(2) SCC(Cri) i.

Case Laws : Brain Mapping Test.

1. Admissibility of report of brain mapping test-result of a scientific test will depend upon the authenticity.  Whether the brain mapping test is so developed that the report will have probative value so as to enable a court to place reliance thereupon, is a matter which would require further consideration, if and when the materials in support thereof was placed before the court.

2005AIR SCW 2215 .  2005(5) CR.L.J. SC 2533 SCC 46.

2. Under section 173(8) permissibility of brain mapping test where letter by uncle of diseased alleging involvement of wife of diseased in his murder was sent to Human Rights commission, however, no fresh crime was registeredaaginst her on the basis of any further facts and she was neither accused nor witnessed in any otherse, so the order of the magistrate to permittin to conduct brain mapping and lie detection test on her ws not held as proper

CR.L.J. PAGE 35 2007(NOC). BOMBAY 2006 AIR BOMBAY 102.

3. Admissibility of polygraph test as lie  detection test.  As there were other materials sufficient for holding conviction of accused No.2, the supreme Court refrained from going in to the question of admissibility as otherwise of the result of polygraph test in the present case.  2007(2) crimes Page 1 (SC)

4. Conduct of scientific tests like polygraph, Nacro anyalysis and brain mapping of accused, resorting to scientific tests not being amounted to breaking the silence of an accused by force do amount to testimonial compulsion as because unless such tests are conducted the investigating agency may not in a position to come out with clinching testimony against the accused. AIR 2006 SC 1267 /  2006 Cr.L.J. 1679 / 206(2) SCC(Cri) i.

Case Laws : Brain Mapping Test.

1. Admissibility of report of brain mapping test-result of a scientific test will depend upon the authenticity.  Whether the brain mapping test is so developed that the report will have probative value so as to enable a court to place reliance thereupon, is a matter which would require further consideration, if and when the materials in support thereof was placed before the court.

2005AIR SCW 2215 .  2005(5) CR.L.J. SC 2533 SCC 46.

2. Under section 173(8) permissibility of brain mapping test where letter by uncle of diseased alleging involvement of wife of diseased in his murder was sent to Human Rights commission, however, no fresh crime was registeredaaginst her on the basis of any further facts and she was neither accused nor witnessed in any otherse, so the order of the magistrate to permittin to conduct brain mapping and lie detection test on her ws not held as proper

CR.L.J. PAGE 35 2007(NOC). BOMBAY 2006 AIR BOMBAY 102.

3. Admissibility of polygraph test as lie  detection test.  As there were other materials sufficient for holding conviction of accused No.2, the supreme Court refrained from going in to the question of admissibility as otherwise of the result of polygraph test in the present case.  2007(2) crimes Page 1 (SC)

4. Conduct of scientific tests like polygraph, Nacro anyalysis and brain mapping of accused, resorting to scientific tests not being amounted to breaking the silence of an accused by force do amount to testimonial compulsion as because unless such tests are conducted the investigating agency may not in a position to come out with clinching testimony against the accused. AIR 2006 SC 1267 /  2006 Cr.L.J. 1679 / 206(2) SCC(Cri) i.

Case Laws : Brain Mapping Test.

1. Admissibility of report of brain mapping test-result of a scientific test will depend upon the authenticity.  Whether the brain mapping test is so developed that the report will have probative value so as to enable a court to place reliance thereupon, is a matter which would require further consideration, if and when the materials in support thereof was placed before the court.

2005AIR SCW 2215 .  2005(5) CR.L.J. SC 2533 SCC 46.

2. Under section 173(8) permissibility of brain mapping test where letter by uncle of diseased alleging involvement of wife of diseased in his murder was sent to Human Rights commission, however, no fresh crime was registeredaaginst her on the basis of any further facts and she was neither accused nor witnessed in any otherse, so the order of the magistrate to permittin to conduct brain mapping and lie detection test on her ws not held as proper

CR.L.J. PAGE 35 2007(NOC). BOMBAY 2006 AIR BOMBAY 102.

3. Admissibility of polygraph test as lie  detection test.  As there were other materials sufficient for holding conviction of accused No.2, the supreme Court refrained from going in to the question of admissibility as otherwise of the result of polygraph test in the present case.  2007(2) crimes Page 1 (SC)

4. Conduct of scientific tests like polygraph, Nacro anyalysis and brain mapping of accused, resorting to scientific tests not being amounted to breaking the silence of an accused by force do amount to testimonial compulsion as because unless such tests are conducted the investigating agency may not in a position to come out with clinching testimony against the accused. AIR 2006 SC 1267 /  2006 Cr.L.J. 1679 / 206(2) SCC(Cri) i.

Case Laws : Brain Mapping Test.

1. Admissibility of report of brain mapping test-result of a scientific test will depend upon the authenticity.  Whether the brain mapping test is so developed that the report will have probative value so as to enable a court to place reliance thereupon, is a matter which would require further consideration, if and when the materials in support thereof was placed before the court.

2005AIR SCW 2215 .  2005(5) CR.L.J. SC 2533 SCC 46.

2. Under section 173(8) permissibility of brain mapping test where letter by uncle of diseased alleging involvement of wife of diseased in his murder was sent to Human Rights commission, however, no fresh crime was registeredaaginst her on the basis of any further facts and she was neither accused nor witnessed in any otherse, so the order of the magistrate to permittin to conduct brain mapping and lie detection test on her ws not held as proper

CR.L.J. PAGE 35 2007(NOC). BOMBAY 2006 AIR BOMBAY 102.

3. Admissibility of polygraph test as lie  detection test.  As there were other materials sufficient for holding conviction of accused No.2, the supreme Court refrained from going in to the question of admissibility as otherwise of the result of polygraph test in the present case.  2007(2) crimes Page 1 (SC)

4. Conduct of scientific tests like polygraph, Nacro anyalysis and brain mapping of accused, resorting to scientific tests not being amounted to breaking the silence of an accused by force do amount to testimonial compulsion as because unless such tests are conducted the investigating agency may not in a position to come out with clinching testimony against the accused. AIR 2006 SC 1267 /  2006 Cr.L.J. 1679 / 206(2) SCC(Cri) i.

Case Laws : Brain Mapping Test.

1. Admissibility of report of brain mapping test-result of a scientific test will depend upon the authenticity.  Whether the brain mapping test is so developed that the report will have probative value so as to enable a court to place reliance thereupon, is a matter which would require further consideration, if and when the materials in support thereof was placed before the court.

2005AIR SCW 2215 .  2005(5) CR.L.J. SC 2533 SCC 46.

2. Under section 173(8) permissibility of brain mapping test where letter by uncle of diseased alleging involvement of wife of diseased in his murder was sent to Human Rights commission, however, no fresh crime was registeredaaginst her on the basis of any further facts and she was neither accused nor witnessed in any otherse, so the order of the magistrate to permittin to conduct brain mapping and lie detection test on her ws not held as proper

CR.L.J. PAGE 35 2007(NOC). BOMBAY 2006 AIR BOMBAY 102.

3. Admissibility of polygraph test as lie  detection test.  As there were other materials sufficient for holding conviction of accused No.2, the supreme Court refrained from going in to the question of admissibility as otherwise of the result of polygraph test in the present case.  2007(2) crimes Page 1 (SC)

4. Conduct of scientific tests like polygraph, Nacro anyalysis and brain mapping of accused, resorting to scientific tests not being amounted to breaking the silence of an accused by force do amount to testimonial compulsion as because unless such tests are conducted the investigating agency may not in a position to come out with clinching testimony against the accused. AIR 2006 SC 1267 /  2006 Cr.L.J. 1679 / 206(2) SCC(Cri) i.

Case Laws : Brain Mapping Test.

1. Admissibility of report of brain mapping test-result of a scientific test will depend upon the authenticity.  Whether the brain mapping test is so developed that the report will have probative value so as to enable a court to place reliance thereupon, is a matter which would require further consideration, if and when the materials in support thereof was placed before the court.

2005AIR SCW 2215 .  2005(5) CR.L.J. SC 2533 SCC 46.

2. Under section 173(8) permissibility of brain mapping test where letter by uncle of diseased alleging involvement of wife of diseased in his murder was sent to Human Rights commission, however, no fresh crime was registeredaaginst her on the basis of any further facts and she was neither accused nor witnessed in any otherse, so the order of the magistrate to permittin to conduct brain mapping and lie detection test on her ws not held as proper

CR.L.J. PAGE 35 2007(NOC). BOMBAY 2006 AIR BOMBAY 102.

3. Admissibility of polygraph test as lie  detection test.  As there were other materials sufficient for holding conviction of accused No.2, the supreme Court refrained from going in to the question of admissibility as otherwise of the result of polygraph test in the present case.  2007(2) crimes Page 1 (SC)

4. Conduct of scientific tests like polygraph, Nacro anyalysis and brain mapping of accused, resorting to scientific tests not being amounted to breaking the silence of an accused by force do amount to testimonial compulsion as because unless such tests are conducted the investigating agency may not in a position to come out with clinching testimony against the accused. AIR 2006 SC 1267 /  2006 Cr.L.J. 1679 / 206(2) SCC(Cri) i.

Case Laws : Brain Mapping Test.

1. Admissibility of report of brain mapping test-result of a scientific test will depend upon the authenticity.  Whether the brain mapping test is so developed that the report will have probative value so as to enable a court to place reliance thereupon, is a matter which would require further consideration, if and when the materials in support thereof was placed before the court.

2005AIR SCW 2215 .  2005(5) CR.L.J. SC 2533 SCC 46.

2. Under section 173(8) permissibility of brain mapping test where letter by uncle of diseased alleging involvement of wife of diseased in his murder was sent to Human Rights commission, however, no fresh crime was registeredaaginst her on the basis of any further facts and she was neither accused nor witnessed in any otherse, so the order of the magistrate to permittin to conduct brain mapping and lie detection test on her ws not held as proper

CR.L.J. PAGE 35 2007(NOC). BOMBAY 2006 AIR BOMBAY 102.

3. Admissibility of polygraph test as lie  detection test.  As there were other materials sufficient for holding conviction of accused No.2, the supreme Court refrained from going in to the question of admissibility as otherwise of the result of polygraph test in the present case.  2007(2) crimes Page 1 (SC)

4. Conduct of scientific tests like polygraph, Nacro anyalysis and brain mapping of accused, resorting to scientific tests not being amounted to breaking the silence of an accused by force do amount to testimonial compulsion as because unless such tests are conducted the investigating agency may not in a position to come out with clinching testimony against the accused. AIR 2006 SC 1267 /  2006 Cr.L.J. 1679 / 206(2) SCC(Cri) i.

Case Laws : Brain Mapping Test.

1. Admissibility of report of brain mapping test-result of a scientific test will depend upon the authenticity.  Whether the brain mapping test is so developed that the report will have probative value so as to enable a court to place reliance thereupon, is a matter which would require further consideration, if and when the materials in support thereof was placed before the court.

2005AIR SCW 2215 .  2005(5) CR.L.J. SC 2533 SCC 46.

2. Under section 173(8) permissibility of brain mapping test where letter by uncle of diseased alleging involvement of wife of diseased in his murder was sent to Human Rights commission, however, no fresh crime was registeredaaginst her on the basis of any further facts and she was neither accused nor witnessed in any otherse, so the order of the magistrate to permittin to conduct brain mapping and lie detection test on her ws not held as proper

CR.L.J. PAGE 35 2007(NOC). BOMBAY 2006 AIR BOMBAY 102.

3. Admissibility of polygraph test as lie  detection test.  As there were other materials sufficient for holding conviction of accused No.2, the supreme Court refrained from going in to the question of admissibility as otherwise of the result of polygraph test in the present case.  2007(2) crimes Page 1 (SC)

4. Conduct of scientific tests like polygraph, Nacro anyalysis and brain mapping of accused, resorting to scientific tests not being amounted to breaking the silence of an accused by force do amount to testimonial compulsion as because unless such tests are conducted the investigating agency may not in a position to come out with clinching testimony against the accused. AIR 2006 SC 1267 /  2006 Cr.L.J. 1679 / 206(2) SCC(Cri) i.

Case Laws : Brain Mapping Test.

1. Admissibility of report of brain mapping test-result of a scientific test will depend upon the authenticity.  Whether the brain mapping test is so developed that the report will have probative value so as to enable a court to place reliance thereupon, is a matter which would require further consideration, if and when the materials in support thereof was placed before the court.

2005AIR SCW 2215 .  2005(5) CR.L.J. SC 2533 SCC 46.

2. Under section 173(8) permissibility of brain mapping test where letter by uncle of diseased alleging involvement of wife of diseased in his murder was sent to Human Rights commission, however, no fresh crime was registeredaaginst her on the basis of any further facts and she was neither accused nor witnessed in any otherse, so the order of the magistrate to permittin to conduct brain mapping and lie detection test on her ws not held as proper

CR.L.J. PAGE 35 2007(NOC). BOMBAY 2006 AIR BOMBAY 102.

3. Admissibility of polygraph test as lie  detection test.  As there were other materials sufficient for holding conviction of accused No.2, the supreme Court refrained from going in to the question of admissibility as otherwise of the result of polygraph test in the present case.  2007(2) crimes Page 1 (SC)

4. Conduct of scientific tests like polygraph, Nacro anyalysis and brain mapping of accused, resorting to scientific tests not being amounted to breaking the silence of an accused by force do amount to testimonial compulsion as because unless such tests are conducted the investigating agency may not in a position to come out with clinching testimony against the accused. AIR 2006 SC 1267 /  2006 Cr.L.J. 1679 / 206(2) SCC(Cri) i.

Case Laws : Brain Mapping Test.

1. Admissibility of report of brain mapping test-result of a scientific test will depend upon the authenticity.  Whether the brain mapping test is so developed that the report will have probative value so as to enable a court to place reliance thereupon, is a matter which would require further consideration, if and when the materials in support thereof was placed before the court.

2005AIR SCW 2215 .  2005(5) CR.L.J. SC 2533 SCC 46.

2. Under section 173(8) permissibility of brain mapping test where letter by uncle of diseased alleging involvement of wife of diseased in his murder was sent to Human Rights commission, however, no fresh crime was registeredaaginst her on the basis of any further facts and she was neither accused nor witnessed in any otherse, so the order of the magistrate to permittin to conduct brain mapping and lie detection test on her ws not held as proper

CR.L.J. PAGE 35 2007(NOC). BOMBAY 2006 AIR BOMBAY 102.

3. Admissibility of polygraph test as lie  detection test.  As there were other materials sufficient for holding conviction of accused No.2, the supreme Court refrained from going in to the question of admissibility as otherwise of the result of polygraph test in the present case.  2007(2) crimes Page 1 (SC)

4. Conduct of scientific tests like polygraph, Nacro anyalysis and brain mapping of accused, resorting to scientific tests not being amounted to breaking the silence of an accused by force do amount to testimonial compulsion as because unless such tests are conducted the investigating agency may not in a position to come out with clinching testimony against the accused. AIR 2006 SC 1267 /  2006 Cr.L.J. 1679 / 206(2) SCC(Cri) i.

Case Laws : Brain Mapping Test.

1. Admissibility of report of brain mapping test-result of a scientific test will depend upon the authenticity.  Whether the brain mapping test is so developed that the report will have probative value so as to enable a court to place reliance thereupon, is a matter which would require further consideration, if and when the materials in support thereof was placed before the court.

2005AIR SCW 2215 .  2005(5) CR.L.J. SC 2533 SCC 46.

2. Under section 173(8) permissibility of brain mapping test where letter by uncle of diseased alleging involvement of wife of diseased in his murder was sent to Human Rights commission, however, no fresh crime was registeredaaginst her on the basis of any further facts and she was neither accused nor witnessed in any otherse, so the order of the magistrate to permittin to conduct brain mapping and lie detection test on her ws not held as proper

CR.L.J. PAGE 35 2007(NOC). BOMBAY 2006 AIR BOMBAY 102.

3. Admissibility of polygraph test as lie  detection test.  As there were other materials sufficient for holding conviction of accused No.2, the supreme Court refrained from going in to the question of admissibility as otherwise of the result of polygraph test in the present case.  2007(2) crimes Page 1 (SC)

4. Conduct of scientific tests like polygraph, Nacro anyalysis and brain mapping of accused, resorting to scientific tests not being amounted to breaking the silence of an accused by force do amount to testimonial compulsion as because unless such tests are conducted the investigating agency may not in a position to come out with clinching testimony against the accused. AIR 2006 SC 1267 /  2006 Cr.L.J. 1679 / 206(2) SCC(Cri) i.

Case Laws : Brain Mapping Test.

1. Admissibility of report of brain mapping test-result of a scientific test will depend upon the authenticity.  Whether the brain mapping test is so developed that the report will have probative value so as to enable a court to place reliance thereupon, is a matter which would require further consideration, if and when the materials in support thereof was placed before the court.

2005AIR SCW 2215 .  2005(5) CR.L.J. SC 2533 SCC 46.

2. Under section 173(8) permissibility of brain mapping test where letter by uncle of diseased alleging involvement of wife of diseased in his murder was sent to Human Rights commission, however, no fresh crime was registeredaaginst her on the basis of any further facts and she was neither accused nor witnessed in any otherse, so the order of the magistrate to permittin to conduct brain mapping and lie detection test on her ws not held as proper

CR.L.J. PAGE 35 2007(NOC). BOMBAY 2006 AIR BOMBAY 102.

3. Admissibility of polygraph test as lie  detection test.  As there were other materials sufficient for holding conviction of accused No.2, the supreme Court refrained from going in to the question of admissibility as otherwise of the result of polygraph test in the present case.  2007(2) crimes Page 1 (SC)

4. Conduct of scientific tests like polygraph, Nacro anyalysis and brain mapping of accused, resorting to scientific tests not being amounted to breaking the silence of an accused by force do amount to testimonial compulsion as because unless such tests are conducted the investigating agency may not in a position to come out with clinching testimony against the accused. AIR 2006 SC 1267 /  2006 Cr.L.J. 1679 / 206(2) SCC(Cri) i.

Case Laws : Brain Mapping Test.

1. Admissibility of report of brain mapping test-result of a scientific test will depend upon the authenticity.  Whether the brain mapping test is so developed that the report will have probative value so as to enable a court to place reliance thereupon, is a matter which would require further consideration, if and when the materials in support thereof was placed before the court.

2005AIR SCW 2215 .  2005(5) CR.L.J. SC 2533 SCC 46.

2. Under section 173(8) permissibility of brain mapping test where letter by uncle of diseased alleging involvement of wife of diseased in his murder was sent to Human Rights commission, however, no fresh crime was registeredaaginst her on the basis of any further facts and she was neither accused nor witnessed in any otherse, so the order of the magistrate to permittin to conduct brain mapping and lie detection test on her ws not held as proper

CR.L.J. PAGE 35 2007(NOC). BOMBAY 2006 AIR BOMBAY 102.

3. Admissibility of polygraph test as lie  detection test.  As there were other materials sufficient for holding conviction of accused No.2, the supreme Court refrained from going in to the question of admissibility as otherwise of the result of polygraph test in the present case.  2007(2) crimes Page 1 (SC)

4. Conduct of scientific tests like polygraph, Nacro anyalysis and brain mapping of accused, resorting to scientific tests not being amounted to breaking the silence of an accused by force do amount to testimonial compulsion as because unless such tests are conducted the investigating agency may not in a position to come out with clinching testimony against the accused. AIR 2006 SC 1267 /  2006 Cr.L.J. 1679 / 206(2) SCC(Cri) i.

Case Laws : Brain Mapping Test.

1. Admissibility of report of brain mapping test-result of a scientific test will depend upon the authenticity.  Whether the brain mapping test is so developed that the report will have probative value so as to enable a court to place reliance thereupon, is a matter which would require further consideration, if and when the materials in support thereof was placed before the court.

2005AIR SCW 2215 .  2005(5) CR.L.J. SC 2533 SCC 46.

2. Under section 173(8) permissibility of brain mapping test where letter by uncle of diseased alleging involvement of wife of diseased in his murder was sent to Human Rights commission, however, no fresh crime was registeredaaginst her on the basis of any further facts and she was neither accused nor witnessed in any otherse, so the order of the magistrate to permittin to conduct brain mapping and lie detection test on her ws not held as proper

CR.L.J. PAGE 35 2007(NOC). BOMBAY 2006 AIR BOMBAY 102.

3. Admissibility of polygraph test as lie  detection test.  As there were other materials sufficient for holding conviction of accused No.2, the supreme Court refrained from going in to the question of admissibility as otherwise of the result of polygraph test in the present case.  2007(2) crimes Page 1 (SC)

4. Conduct of scientific tests like polygraph, Nacro anyalysis and brain mapping of accused, resorting to scientific tests not being amounted to breaking the silence of an accused by force do amount to testimonial compulsion as because unless such tests are conducted the investigating agency may not in a position to come out with clinching testimony against the accused. AIR 2006 SC 1267 /  2006 Cr.L.J. 1679 / 206(2) SCC(Cri) i.

Case Laws : Brain Mapping Test.

1. Admissibility of report of brain mapping test-result of a scientific test will depend upon the authenticity.  Whether the brain mapping test is so developed that the report will have probative value so as to enable a court to place reliance thereupon, is a matter which would require further consideration, if and when the materials in support thereof was placed before the court.

2005AIR SCW 2215 .  2005(5) CR.L.J. SC 2533 SCC 46.

2. Under section 173(8) permissibility of brain mapping test where letter by uncle of diseased alleging involvement of wife of diseased in his murder was sent to Human Rights commission, however, no fresh crime was registeredaaginst her on the basis of any further facts and she was neither accused nor witnessed in any otherse, so the order of the magistrate to permittin to conduct brain mapping and lie detection test on her ws not held as proper

CR.L.J. PAGE 35 2007(NOC). BOMBAY 2006 AIR BOMBAY 102.

3. Admissibility of polygraph test as lie  detection test.  As there were other materials sufficient for holding conviction of accused No.2, the supreme Court refrained from going in to the question of admissibility as otherwise of the result of polygraph test in the present case.  2007(2) crimes Page 1 (SC)

4. Conduct of scientific tests like polygraph, Nacro anyalysis and brain mapping of accused, resorting to scientific tests not being amounted to breaking the silence of an accused by force do amount to testimonial compulsion as because unless such tests are conducted the investigating agency may not in a position to come out with clinching testimony against the accused. AIR 2006 SC 1267 /  2006 Cr.L.J. 1679 / 206(2) SCC(Cri) i.

Case Laws : Brain Mapping Test.

1. Admissibility of report of brain mapping test-result of a scientific test will depend upon the authenticity.  Whether the brain mapping test is so developed that the report will have probative value so as to enable a court to place reliance thereupon, is a matter which would require further consideration, if and when the materials in support thereof was placed before the court.

2005AIR SCW 2215 .  2005(5) CR.L.J. SC 2533 SCC 46.

2. Under section 173(8) permissibility of brain mapping test where letter by uncle of diseased alleging involvement of wife of diseased in his murder was sent to Human Rights commission, however, no fresh crime was registeredaaginst her on the basis of any further facts and she was neither accused nor witnessed in any otherse, so the order of the magistrate to permittin to conduct brain mapping and lie detection test on her ws not held as proper

CR.L.J. PAGE 35 2007(NOC). BOMBAY 2006 AIR BOMBAY 102.

3. Admissibility of polygraph test as lie  detection test.  As there were other materials sufficient for holding conviction of accused No.2, the supreme Court refrained from going in to the question of admissibility as otherwise of the result of polygraph test in the present case.  2007(2) crimes Page 1 (SC)

4. Conduct of scientific tests like polygraph, Nacro anyalysis and brain mapping of accused, resorting to scientific tests not being amounted to breaking the silence of an accused by force do amount to testimonial compulsion as because unless such tests are conducted the investigating agency may not in a position to come out with clinching testimony against the accused. AIR 2006 SC 1267 /  2006 Cr.L.J. 1679 / 206(2) SCC(Cri) i.

Case Laws : Brain Mapping Test.

1. Admissibility of report of brain mapping test-result of a scientific test will depend upon the authenticity.  Whether the brain mapping test is so developed that the report will have probative value so as to enable a court to place reliance thereupon, is a matter which would require further consideration, if and when the materials in support thereof was placed before the court.

2005AIR SCW 2215 .  2005(5) CR.L.J. SC 2533 SCC 46.

2. Under section 173(8) permissibility of brain mapping test where letter by uncle of diseased alleging involvement of wife of diseased in his murder was sent to Human Rights commission, however, no fresh crime was registeredaaginst her on the basis of any further facts and she was neither accused nor witnessed in any otherse, so the order of the magistrate to permittin to conduct brain mapping and lie detection test on her ws not held as proper

CR.L.J. PAGE 35 2007(NOC). BOMBAY 2006 AIR BOMBAY 102.

3. Admissibility of polygraph test as lie  detection test.  As there were other materials sufficient for holding conviction of accused No.2, the supreme Court refrained from going in to the question of admissibility as otherwise of the result of polygraph test in the present case.  2007(2) crimes Page 1 (SC)

4. Conduct of scientific tests like polygraph, Nacro anyalysis and brain mapping of accused, resorting to scientific tests not being amounted to breaking the silence of an accused by force do amount to testimonial compulsion as because unless such tests are conducted the investigating agency may not in a position to come out with clinching testimony against the accused. AIR 2006 SC 1267 /  2006 Cr.L.J. 1679 / 206(2) SCC(Cri) i.

Case Laws : Brain Mapping Test.

1. Admissibility of report of brain mapping test-result of a scientific test will depend upon the authenticity.  Whether the brain mapping test is so developed that the report will have probative value so as to enable a court to place reliance thereupon, is a matter which would require further consideration, if and when the materials in support thereof was placed before the court.

2005AIR SCW 2215 .  2005(5) CR.L.J. SC 2533 SCC 46.

2. Under section 173(8) permissibility of brain mapping test where letter by uncle of diseased alleging involvement of wife of diseased in his murder was sent to Human Rights commission, however, no fresh crime was registeredaaginst her on the basis of any further facts and she was neither accused nor witnessed in any otherse, so the order of the magistrate to permittin to conduct brain mapping and lie detection test on her ws not held as proper

CR.L.J. PAGE 35 2007(NOC). BOMBAY 2006 AIR BOMBAY 102.

3. Admissibility of polygraph test as lie  detection test.  As there were other materials sufficient for holding conviction of accused No.2, the supreme Court refrained from going in to the question of admissibility as otherwise of the result of polygraph test in the present case.  2007(2) crimes Page 1 (SC)

4. Conduct of scientific tests like polygraph, Nacro anyalysis and brain mapping of accused, resorting to scientific tests not being amounted to breaking the silence of an accused by force do amount to testimonial compulsion as because unless such tests are conducted the investigating agency may not in a position to come out with clinching testimony against the accused. AIR 2006 SC 1267 /  2006 Cr.L.J. 1679 / 206(2) SCC(Cri) i.

Case Laws : Brain Mapping Test.

1. Admissibility of report of brain mapping test-result of a scientific test will depend upon the authenticity.  Whether the brain mapping test is so developed that the report will have probative value so as to enable a court to place reliance thereupon, is a matter which would require further consideration, if and when the materials in support thereof was placed before the court.

2005AIR SCW 2215 .  2005(5) CR.L.J. SC 2533 SCC 46.

2. Under section 173(8) permissibility of brain mapping test where letter by uncle of diseased alleging involvement of wife of diseased in his murder was sent to Human Rights commission, however, no fresh crime was registeredaaginst her on the basis of any further facts and she was neither accused nor witnessed in any otherse, so the order of the magistrate to permittin to conduct brain mapping and lie detection test on her ws not held as proper

CR.L.J. PAGE 35 2007(NOC). BOMBAY 2006 AIR BOMBAY 102.

3. Admissibility of polygraph test as lie  detection test.  As there were other materials sufficient for holding conviction of accused No.2, the supreme Court refrained from going in to the question of admissibility as otherwise of the result of polygraph test in the present case.  2007(2) crimes Page 1 (SC)

4. Conduct of scientific tests like polygraph, Nacro anyalysis and brain mapping of accused, resorting to scientific tests not being amounted to breaking the silence of an accused by force do amount to testimonial compulsion as because unless such tests are conducted the investigating agency may not in a position to come out with clinching testimony against the accused. AIR 2006 SC 1267 /  2006 Cr.L.J. 1679 / 206(2) SCC(Cri) i.

Case Laws : Brain Mapping Test.

1. Admissibility of report of brain mapping test-result of a scientific test will depend upon the authenticity.  Whether the brain mapping test is so developed that the report will have probative value so as to enable a court to place reliance thereupon, is a matter which would require further consideration, if and when the materials in support thereof was placed before the court.

2005AIR SCW 2215 .  2005(5) CR.L.J. SC 2533 SCC 46.

2. Under section 173(8) permissibility of brain mapping test where letter by uncle of diseased alleging involvement of wife of diseased in his murder was sent to Human Rights commission, however, no fresh crime was registeredaaginst her on the basis of any further facts and she was neither accused nor witnessed in any otherse, so the order of the magistrate to permittin to conduct brain mapping and lie detection test on her ws not held as proper

CR.L.J. PAGE 35 2007(NOC). BOMBAY 2006 AIR BOMBAY 102.

3. Admissibility of polygraph test as lie  detection test.  As there were other materials sufficient for holding conviction of accused No.2, the supreme Court refrained from going in to the question of admissibility as otherwise of the result of polygraph test in the present case.  2007(2) crimes Page 1 (SC)

4. Conduct of scientific tests like polygraph, Nacro anyalysis and brain mapping of accused, resorting to scientific tests not being amounted to breaking the silence of an accused by force do amount to testimonial compulsion as because unless such tests are conducted the investigating agency may not in a position to come out with clinching testimony against the accused. AIR 2006 SC 1267 /  2006 Cr.L.J. 1679 / 206(2) SCC(Cri) i.