Yaakov Neeman's modus operandi - walking the fine line between truth and
lies, and apparently crossing that line as well - is not worthy of a commercial
lawyer, whose main interest is the outcome for his client. It is intolerable in
a justice minister. For over 24 hours, Neeman concealed from the public Prof.
Yedidia Stern's condition that he would only accept the post of attorney general
if the government decided on whether to split the position as soon as possible.
Stern, for his part, didn't bother to withdraw his candidacy immediately after a
decision on the proposal was delayed - even though the prime minister made it
clear that there would be no split in the foreseeable future.
At the least, we have before us a web of lies. In the worst case, perhaps an
attempt to split the attorney general position from within - contradicting the
decision of the prime minister and the stance of both the Labor Party and
Yisrael Beiteinu.
Neeman announced publicly he was "deliberating" between the split and the
current arrangement, after he'd already decided privately to split the job. When
his hopes were dashed and the prime minister decided against the split, Neeman
started to use stratagems to achieve his objective. The meticulously written
report in the daily Yedioth Ahronoth regarding the withdrawal of Stern's
candidacy (which was actually nonexistent) doesn't change the fact that the
candidacy was withdrawn only after Tomer Zarchin exposed the concealed personal
friendship between Neeman and Stern, as published yesterday in Haaretz.
Advertisement
Yehuda Weinstein, a professional and highly regarded criminal lawyer, is not
the person for the job, which for the most part does not deal with criminal law.
The choice of Weinstein, as far as Neeman is concerned, is a step on the way to
his appointment as chief prosecutor, which Neeman wants, and to the split that
Neeman has declared he will continue to promote.
The worthy candidates for the position of attorney general are Prof. Daphne
Barak-Erez and attorney Zvi Agmon, but we need a new justice minister as well:
Neeman is not sufficiently involved in improving the legal system for the
public's benefit. He undermines the opinions of the prime minister and the
coalition, operates in the dark and conceals information from the public to
weaken the rule of law. And he sees nothing wrong in employing methods unworthy
of a decent person, let alone a justice minister.
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"
Tags :Civil Law