LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

pramod tadakhe   25 December 2010 at 19:13

which writ petition we can file in high court for rejection of residencial certificate

a tahsildar issued a residencial certificate on complaint of strenger and explainatio given by person to whom certificate is issued and discussion with pp he reject the certificate can we apprpach to high court and on which base

Anonymous   25 December 2010 at 08:22

Legal heir certificate

A tahsildar has issued two legal heir certificates. What can i do to challenge the second certificate?

Anonymous   23 December 2010 at 21:45

RTI Reply--Can I get by HAND or BY REGD. POST ???

PIO send RTI reply by ordinary post.

Our post man is very easy to be manipulated.


So I wanna get RTI replies either by HAND or by REGD. POST only, I am ready to pay extra money also ,



Is it possible,if yes, how???

What steps should I take????

Aashish Satpute.   22 December 2010 at 17:33

Narco analysis????//

The prosecution has applied for Narco analysis examination and Brain Electrical Activation profile (BEAP) of accused to prevent criminal activities in the future as well as in the said offence(i.e he was charge sheeted for 7 bomb blasts and acquitted in all cases)where it is difficult to gather evidence through ordinary means.
The accused raised an objection that prosecution cannot carry these without his consent as it is violation of his fundamental right guaranteed under ART.20(3),and ART.21 of Indian constitution.
trial court has allowed the application of prosecution. the accused challenged the order of the trial court in the high court.
The high court also reject the application of accused and confirms the order of trial court.
THE accused prefers appeal against the order of trial court and confirming order of high court in supreme court on following grounds.
The involuntary administration of these techniques violates the right against “Self incrimination” enumerated in art20(3) and art.21 of Indian constitution
The investigation use of impugned techniques create a likelihood of incrimination for the subject.
The result derived from the above techniques amounts to ” Testimonial compulsion” thereby violating right guaranteed under art.20(3).
The involuntary administration of above techniques exceed the reasonable restriction on “personal liberty” guaranteed under art.21 of constitution.
above was discussion between me and frendz while in library…………..

Q.1 IS SUCH EXAMINATION VIOLATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT UNDER ART.20(3).

Q.2 IS THERE ANY CASE LAW FOR SUCH VIOLATION?
PLZ GIVE ALL DIRECTION HOW TO TACKLE SUCH PROBLEM……

Anonymous   22 December 2010 at 13:48

constitution

wat is doctrine of aclips

Ajit   22 December 2010 at 11:19

Election

Can anyone give me the SC Judgement on the reservation of OBC seats in local body elections?or the name of the case in which SC said this thing...?

Adv. karinamishra   21 December 2010 at 18:36

surrogacy

whether the ICMR guidelines on surrogacy are violative to Article 21?


Vithal. Upari   20 December 2010 at 15:03

notes

Sir,

I am first year LLB Student, I am pursuing LLB from Karnataka Law Society. Can You please help me to get the in short notes on the subject like " Indian Constituion", IPC Act 1860, Hindu Law, Law of Torts,Contract ACt 1872. Please do post either to my mail id vithal.2007@gmail.com it may be in excel or word format or in Zip file.....

Regards
Vithal

Anonymous   20 December 2010 at 12:33

Does it take 12 years for Allahabad High Court writ to be issued?

Dear Experts,

Does it take 12 years for Allahabad High Court writ to be issued? Please refer the attached copy of writ. On top it says "WRIT - C No. - 18463 of 1998". On bottom it says "Order Date :- 3.12.2010"

Anonymous   20 December 2010 at 09:22

Is it necessary to call the PIO in the Court to prove the validity of his reply??

If a reply of RTI is filed in a Court,Is it necessary to call the PIO in the Court to prove the validity of his reply??



I mean to say that if a reply given by a PIO is filed in a Court in original (signed by PIO but not stamped by PIO), with its envelope---is it necessary to call the PIO or record of that Govt. entity in the Court to prove the validity of that RTI reply??