Dear sir,
A employee, who is under probation period, had given his one month notice and resignation to the managing committee of the school, (it is typed and signed by the employee). Later on he had given a affidavit to D.C that he had not given his resignation and the resignation and other blank papers and signed by him is a result of cheating by the managing committee, and he had given a statement before the district education officer that the had not given any resignation and the resignation and the other documents are signed by him is result of cheating by the managing committee, now the d.e.o is saying to join them, but the managing committee don’t want to join them, as they are not good teachers, as appointing authority can managing committee refuse them to join, because the resignation is accepted by the headmaster and managing committee and the resolution is passed by the managing committee for their resignation. Can we(manageing committee) , can take any criminal action against them for firstly giving resignation and signing on it and then giving a false affidavit before D.c and D.e.o that they had not given resignation, and for allegation against the managing committee
whether art 15is available to the only or also to the non-citizen
sir, as you know banks file case against me u/s 37 c.p.c. and u/s 420,406 cr.p.c for non payment of credit card and personal loan.
if i able to Seattle with the bank for my card dues and bank withdrawn case then can i file this "deformation suit" against bank for criminal case.
sir
can haebus corpus petition/ or other writ can be filed in supreme court directly as well as in high court also, what is the difference?
Sir,
I had filed a case before the permanent Lok-adalath under section 22 of legal service Authority Act.
The said case was for concilliation and settlement of difference against the Reliance Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
My client was a service provider to the opposite party by a Contract.
The opposite party moved an application for maintainablity of my suit.
The Permanent Lok Adalath has dismissed my case only on the ground of section 5 of arbitration Act.
I want to know that whether section 89 of Civil Proceedure Code be implimented in cases where there is an arbitration clause in a contract and brought to the Adalath as alternate Dispute Resolution in cases in which the parties entering before filing a case in Court?
You have been watching the recent developments in Indian political scenario. Alliances between the political parties are only to have the power. The party who is sailing with one party and praising the party for all these years, on one fine day, turns u round and starts blaming the same party. In this context, to avoid frequent disturbances in the Centre and also in the States, whether it is necessary to bring the two-party system in India in place of number of political parties.
What is your view regarding the conduct of Narco-Analysis Test and its constitutionally validity? Is every body who are connected with a case can be forced to under go such a test? All the high courts have unanimously upheld the constiutional validity of the NARCO-ANALYSIS test and its relevancy of Indian Evidence Act.
Can you post your views?
DEAR SIR,
IN THE LIST OF BC, SC, ST THERE ARE SOMANY CASTE HAS BECOME UPPER CASTE IN SOCIAL, ECONAMICAL AND POLITICAL LEVEL. BUT THE GOVERNMENT DID NOT REMOVE THOSE CASTES FROM THE LIST.THEREFORE THE DEVELOPED CASTES ARE EXPLOITING OPPERTUNITY OF THE OTHER CASTE, WHICH ARE UNDER DEVELOPED. FOR THE EXAMPLE "MARAVAR" CASTE IS MOST BACKWARD CLASS IN RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT, TAMILNADU. INFACT THE MARAVAR COMMUNITY IS DOMINATED AND UPPER CASTE. BECAUSE THE KINGS OF RAMANATHAPURAM BELONGED TO THE MARAVAR COMMUNITY. BUT THE WASHERMAN CASTE ALSO IN THE MOST BACK WARD CLASS. THE WASHERMAN CASTE STILL NOW VERY LOW LEVEL IN ECONOMICAL, SOCIAL AND POLITICAL.
WHAT IS THE REMEDY TO REVIEW THE BC, SC , ST LIST AS PER THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE CASTE IN POLITICAL, SOCIAL AND ECONOMICAL. IN TAMIL NADU ONLY FOR THE VOTE THEY HAVE CREATED MOST BACKWARD CLASS. WHO ARE THE MAJORITY COMMUNITY THEY WILL BE IN MOST BACKWARD CLASS, LIKE IN NORTHERN TAMILNADU VANNIAR IS MAJORITY HENCE THEY ARE MBC, LIKEWISE IN SOUTH MARAVAR AND PIRAMALI KALLAR ARE MAJORITY THEY ARE MBC.
DEAR SIR,
VIDEO PIRACY THERE IS COPYRIGHT ACT AND THERE IS PUNISHMENT ALSO. AND THE COPY RIGHT ACT COMES UNDER THE UNION LIST, WHILESO TAMIL NADU GOVERNMENT HAS ENACTED ONE LAW IN 2005 FOR THE VIDEO PIRACY. IF ANY PERSON COMMITS OFFENCE IN VIDEO PIRACY THAT ACT HAS GIVEN POWE TO PUT THEM IN GOONDAS ACT.
MY QUESTION IS IN UNION LIST ACT STATE GOVERNMENT WHETER HAS POWER TO INSERT GOONDAS? KINDLY CLARRIFY.
THANKING YOU
fundamental rights
Whether right to observe silence is a fundamental right?