ravi rai
18 October 2015 at 05:06
Respected Lawyers,
my question is that is it mandatory to use English language in high courts & supreme court , if judges, advocates, clients all understand hindi very well and most of all clients does not know english, as well as if any new lawyer who comes from hindi back ground (hindi medium) can practice or use Hindi language in high courts & supreme court.
is any artical/act/rule/provision is given for such things.
( artical 343-351 )
***note i am hindi midium student & want to practice in high court & supreme court as well.
please guide me on this.
thank you !!!
Anonymous
14 October 2015 at 00:17
I want to know whether managing committee can stop a member of cooperative housing society from washing clothes in balcony according to byelaws laid in cooperative society act.can they send notice and charge fine for this.
SAIKRISHNAVOBILISETTI
13 October 2015 at 21:08
On Jul 29, 2015: yakub memon filed a special leave petition in Supreme Court and the Supreme Court rejects Memon's plea for staying execution, upholds dismissal of curative petition.
After that on the same day he filed a fresh mercy plea to President and Maharashtra Governor and the same has been rejected.
On the next day i.e., on 30 jul,2015 Memon filed fresh petition before Supreme Court seeking stay on execution. SC accepted it for hearing and finally rejects it in the wee hours i.e around 2:30 IST.
MY QUESTION IS : EVEN AFTER THE REJECTION OF HIS SLP, UNDER WHICH PROVISION OF LAW DID YAKUB MEMOM FILED A FRESH PETITION IN THE SUPREME COURT ON 30 JUL 2015, SEEKING FOR STAY ON THE EXECUTION?
PLEASE CLARIFY.
Lalitha
13 October 2015 at 00:32
Hello,
We are working on a semi closed wallet with fingerprint authentication.
What are the rules in India regarding enrolling, storing and usage of finger prints by the sole acceptance of the user interested in our services.
We highly appreciate any information related to this.
Regards
Ram Kulkarni
11 October 2015 at 08:07
Can i get compensetion when there is violation of law in case ,you are refused to give your costitutional rights?
In my case the licence to start buisness has been neither denided nor awarded. No decision taken on application. Written so many reminders and so many fresh applications. I have filled writ in HC. Can i ask for compensation? Is there any provision for compensetion.
indusekhar439
07 October 2015 at 16:34
i wanna know the procedure to reserved a Assembly Seat for SC & ST. How long the Seat be reserved.
why some particular seat are always being reserved ?
sujata
01 October 2015 at 11:33
hi am a tv producer at a govt. organisation(can't name it here). it's that we are working on a special series for special able kids. i need help from an expert to know off their legal rights provided to them by our constitution. this is in the beginning phase (research phase) will tell all the details once we meet.....
yours contribution will be appreciated.
thanks
K.S.Srinivas
01 October 2015 at 11:26
A.P. Reorganisation Act., 2014.
Provision for employees of Public Sector Undertakings, etc.
Section 82. On and from the appointed day, the employees of State Public Sector Undertakings, corporations and other autonomous bodies shall continue to function in such undertaking, corporation or autonomous bodies for a period of one year and during this period the corporate body concerned shall determine the modalities for distributing the personnel between the two successor States.
1) Appointed day is 2nd June 2014.
2) Before the appointed day, the APTRANSCO is the corporate body consisting of 23 districts of unified Andhra Pradesh.
3) Telangana State TRANSCO was created vide orders issued in G.O.Ms.No.26, dated 29-5-2015 and started functioning from 2-6-2015.
4) The residuary APTRANSCO now consists of 13 districts and the TS TRANSCO consists of 10 districts.
5) The unified APTRANSCO issued orders to some of its employees to work in Telangana State TRANSCO on “Order to serve” basis till the employees bifurcation is completed through option process.
In the light of the above and as per section 82 of the Act,
1. Which is the Corporate Body concerned that would determine the modalities for distributing the personnel between the two successor states?
(a) Is it unified APTRANSCO (consisting of 23 districts, which is not there, and the residuary APTRANSCO consists of 13 districts only)
OR
(b) The residuary APTRANSCO (consisting of now 13 districts)
OR
(c) The TSTRAMSCO (consisting of 10 districts) which is created on 29-5-2015 and functioning w.e.f. 2-6-2015.
OR
(d) Central Government.
sanjiv
01 October 2015 at 09:42
Sir please tell me the difference between sections and articles
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Regarding article 14-21 , 343-351***
respected lawyers,
I want to ask that if English language is mandatory to use in high courts & supreme court than is it not affecting the constitutional rights under article 14,16,19,21.
and if not so than please tell me why?
what is the use & importance of given provision under article 343-351 with respect to high courts & supreme court.
there is no role, use & importance of such given raj bhasha hindi**