Anonymous
24 February 2011 at 21:53
If name of person for example is Ravi Kumar Yadav on driving license, PAN Card etc. and writes his name as Ravi Kumar or R. Kumar in his RTI application and/or Writ/PIL Petition to safeguard his caste identity to avoid bias and prejudice. Is he committing any offense?
Anonymous
24 February 2011 at 16:55
Dear LD friends
As per the Indian Contract Act contracts entered between two parties if is one sided then such contract would be null and void. Most of the Bonds are one sided.
In India Bond is illegal w.r.t employment since as per the Indian Statute, bonded labor system was long abolished and no bond can force any person to work against the employees wishes.
Article 19 of Indian Constitution talks of fundamental rights, as per the Article 19 the Constitution the write work is a fundamental right, and under no circumstance does the Fundamental rights under Article 19 be waived by any person nor can any person be forced to do something that amounting to the violation of the rights mentioned under Article 19.
Let me know is this right or wrong my view.
Anonymous
24 February 2011 at 11:14
a supreme court judge can hear proceedings anywhere, like at his residence also. can somebody provide me case ruling for this...?? itss urgent..
Arka Foundation
22 February 2011 at 17:31
Dear Ld Members
The Police is impartial to one our client in a 498a case, as the ex-wife of our client is lawyer of daughter.
Any judgements/citations on ...
1) Every Individual is Innocent Till
Proven Guilty
2) Every Individual is Equal Before the Law
Rgds
AF
Swami Sadashiva Brahmendra Sar
22 February 2011 at 00:23
Reserve category candidates who obtained the rank of general category in merit list have been placed in the general category's select list. Whether at the time of allocation of service they can be treated as reserve category?
Anonymous
21 February 2011 at 15:38
1) I have heard that by using ordinary legislative powers amendment are not laws but by using constitutional powers amendemnts are laws So the query is precise what do u mean by in depth depth ordinary legislative powers & constitutional powers . if possible with the help of a example. For more help refer artilce 13 of the indian cont of india 1949.
But pls explain me the difference & imp between them in details Pls.
2) What do u mean by special Judge shall try a the offence in a summary way ? Actually what do u mean by summary way . Whether ( special Judge shall try a the offence in a summary way )this sentence can be used under any civil , criminal, writ or SLP ?
Basically when ( special Judge shall try a the offence in a summary way ) is used.
Thanks In advance.
God Bless U All.
Anonymous
21 February 2011 at 15:22
1) With its grammatical variations and cognate expressions.
Query : What does it means "With its grammatical variations and cognate expressions." in any law where his words occurs.
Also the meaning of chartered high court as per Civil Procedure code, 1908.
2) THE PROVINCIAL INSOLVENCY ACT, 1920
ACT No. 5 OF 1920 [ 25th February, 1920.]
An Act to consolidate and amend the Law relating to Insolvency 1 as administered by Courts having jurisdiction outside the Presidency- towns 2.
WHEREAS it is expedient to consolidate and amend the law relating to insolvency 1 as administered by Courts having jurisdiction outside the Presidency- towns 2;
THE PRESIDENCY- TOWNS INSOLVENCY ACT, 1909
ACT NO. 3 OF 1909 1 [ 12th March, 1909.]
An Act to amend the Law of Insolvency in the Presidency- Towns 2
WHEREAS it is expedient to amend the law relating to insolvency in the Presidency- towns 3;
Query :1) So what does the peramble says pls in detail also what do u mean by "Insolvency 1 as administered by Courts having jurisdiction outside the Presidency- towns 2." Meaning of 1 & 2 in the abovementioned statement.
Query : 2) So what does the peramble says pls in detail also what do u mean by "An Act to amend the Law of Insolvency in the Presidency- Towns 2
WHEREAS it is expedient to amend the law relating to insolvency in the Presidency- towns 3;" Meaning of 2 & 3 in the abovementioned statement.
Also why the peramble mentioned Presidency- towns 2 & Presidency- towns 3 pl tell me in detail because i am confused which should be used or should kept in mind.
Meaning of Presidency- towns & Presidency.
Which one is applicable when & to whom ?
Pls help me out.
Thanks In Advance.
God Bless U All.
pradyot kumar biswas
16 February 2011 at 17:16
In 2003 PSC received 40 applications for a single vacant post.In 2010 PSC received 35 applications for the same vacant post and out of which 16 were summarily rejected for not having essential qualification. There was only mention of essential qualfn. in the advt. and no other qualfn. like desirable or any other qualfn. was mentioned.
The undersigned appeared in interview in 2003 when 40 applications were received but in 2010 discarded by the PSC to appear in interview on the ground of a clause in information booklet in advt. The clause says that PSC can restrict the no. of applicants for interview when large no. of applications are received by PSC and it is not convenient or possible for PSC to call all applicants for interview. This restriction will be imposed on the basis of qualifn. or experience. This clause was in existence in the year 2003.
The undersigned have been denied his right in the year 2010 when no. of applications were 35 but enjoyed his right with less experience in the year 2003.
Can PSC take such arbitrary decision defining large no. of applications different in different year.
p. k. biswas
Anonymous
15 February 2011 at 13:08
There is a clause in the information booklet of Public Service Commission stating that PSC can restrict the no.of candidates for interview on the basis of qualification or experience if the no. of received applications is large and it is not possible or convenient for the PSC to call all applicants for interview.
For a certain post PSC received 40 applications in 2003 and the undersigned was called for interview. For the same post in 2010 PSC received 35 applications out of which 16 were rejected for not having essential qualification, 4 were rejected on the above mentioned clause of information booklet and 15 were interviewed. The undersigned is in group of 4. Having the higher experience than 2003 the undersigned was discarded from the interview in 2010. Is it fair and legally tenable?
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
advice
What is the time limit to get terminal dies from the employer as per law?
If there is any judgment regarding the same, Please provide ma a copy of the same on my mail ID or tell from where/which website I can get the copy