LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

pratik   06 January 2011 at 16:55

Chief Justice OF The Same High Court.

1) I Have Heaard That If There is a Conflict between 2 same bench decision or co - ordinate bench decision in the same high court than we have to refer to the higher bench means (larger bench)but my question is do the judges or the advocates of the parties have to take the permission form the Chief Justice of the High Court in which case is going on or do they have to inform the Chief Justice of that high court in which case is going. Pls help Me Out & Guide me . As per which section or any case laws or any consitutional powers ?

2) It has been said that if the penal statue or penal provisions , if there are 2 possible interpretation than the judge or any adjucating authority or any Assessing officer or any officer who has given the competent power or has the competent power to take the decision should lean towards the construction which exempts the subject form the peanlty rather than one which imposes the penalty. Pls Elaborate the abovematter with case laws or more valueable Opinions ?

Pls Help me out in the above matters or any opinion pls

Thanks A Lot In Advance.

Anonymous   06 January 2011 at 14:30

Constitution

I want to know the basics of Constitution, though I have gone through the entire book but it is very difficult to understand the same.

I will be thankful to Learned Experts who can tell me in brief about the written will of the people of India.

From Art.1 to Art.398

Uma parameswaran   06 January 2011 at 10:34

Criminal injury compensation Board

Whether Criminal injury compensation Board existing in any state in India?

Anonymous   06 January 2011 at 00:27

Civil Law vis-a-vis Criminal Law

Punishment either in civil or in criminal are penalties upon a person for the breach of any law/ right/ interest etc.

Why there are procedures/ penalties for the breach of civil/ criminal law. Should res-judicata doesnt applies as the two being in contravention of the same principle as they are against the provisions of Article 14/19/21 of the Constitution of India.


Anonymous   06 January 2011 at 00:22

Constitution

Whether the document called Constitution is valid as at the time of formation of the Constitution we do not have a constituent Assembly which have been formed on the basis of the will of the people of the Country?

Anonymous   05 January 2011 at 01:29

India that is Bharat shall be a Union of States

Why India that is Bharat shall be an Union of States?

State within States?

Article 12 Vis-a-Vis Article 36?

Mohammed Khaleelullah   31 December 2010 at 23:29

ESTABLISHMENT OF ISLAMIC BANK

DEAR EXPERTS,
KINDLY CLARIFY THE FOLLOWING QUERIES,
1.DOES THE CONSTITUTION OR ANY OTHER LAW OF THE LAND PROHIBITS ESTABLISHMENT OF ISLAMIC BANK BY THE STATE?
2.DOES THE CONSTITUTION OR ANY OTHER LAW OF THE LAND PROHIBITS ESTABLISHMENT OF ISLAMIC BANK BY AN INDIVIDUAL?
THANKS IN ADVANCE AND BEST WISHES,

Bhawani Mahapatra   31 December 2010 at 15:52

Right to death

Every Indian has right to live, but no one has right to death. Why ?

If right to death be allowed, then will it violate any provision of Indian constitution ?

rajnath desai   31 December 2010 at 08:55

right of a person

If a person lost his right before court due to negligence of his advocate finally and he knows that the case was malpresented.

Can he reagitate the issue on different grounds which were ignored by court and advocate?

sathiyanathan   30 December 2010 at 18:48

reservation and creamy layer

sir ,
my father retired from private factory with an annual income of 5 lakhs in feb 2010.now he has no considerable income.as per creamy layer conditions ,that if annual income of parents are higher than 4.5 lakhs in three consecutive years then one would fall on creamy layer.in my case since my father had retired and other source of in has been very insignificant, will i be in non creamy layer..?