Avinash kumar seth
28 August 2009 at 19:36
From her office record under RTI Act 2005 they informed me her papers cancelled in November 2002 instead of December 2002 next paper started from 27th May 2003 instead of 27th June 2003 and result declared of these SO Grade Exam on 11.12.2003 not in September 2002 or in November 2003. DW verify this record.
Smt. Asha Arya registered a case FIR 37/2004 dated 18.2.2004 she was on leave from 11th Feb 2003 to 19 April 2003 after joining her duty she wrote two letter both letters were verified in Defense witnesses because in her cross she denied her signature on the letter and said she was not admitted that she wrote two letter to her office on 20.4.2005 those letters are as follows case is State v/s Avinash Kumar Seth (self)
Asha Arya wife of Sh. Satish Chandra, resident of 147-Neb Sarai, New Delhi working as Sr. Auditor in the office of the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi, AGCR Bldg., New Delhi-110002, without any influence and pressure from any body disclose that the contents of FIR No. 37/2004 registered on 18.2.2004 at Mandir Marg Police Station, New Delhi are false and fabricated and the above FIR was lodged by me under extreme pressure and threat to me by my husband. I had no intention to label mean and false allegations on anybody but the pressure and threat of my husband led to all this. As regards misbehaviour with Sh. V.S. Chauhan, P.A. by my husband in the office complex during lunch time on 9.3.2004, I am to state that my husband pressurised me to impose on Sh. V.S. Chauhan false allegations of illegal affairs with me. I did all these things the way my husband wanted me to do. I again reiterate that there is no truth in any of the allegation and these are all fabricated.
Sd/-
20/4/2005 true copy attested by Sh. Chaman Bhandari Sr. AO
(Asha Arya) 20/7/2006
To
Shri V.S. Chauhan
PA to Sr. DAG (Admn.)
Dated: 20.4.2005
The above letter verified by Mr. Chaman Bhandari as Defence Witness
To
The Sr. Dy. Acctt. General (Admn.),
O/o the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi,
AGCR Bldg.,
New Delhi-110002
I, Asha Arya wife of Sh. Satish Chandra, resident of 147-Neb Sarai, New Delhi working as Sr. Auditor in the office of the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi, AGCR Bldg., New Delhi without any influence and pressure from an body disclose that the contents of FIR No. 37/2004 registered on 18.2.2004 at Mandir Marg Police Station, New Delhi are false, baseless and fabricated and the above FIR was lodged by me under extreme pressure and threat to me by my husband. I had no intention to label mean and false allegations on anybody but the pressure and threat of my husband led to all this. As regards misbehaviour with Sh. V.S. Chauhan, P.A. by my husband in the office complex during lunch time on 9.3.2004, I am to state that my husband pressurised me to impose on Sh. V.S. Chauhan false allegations of illegal affairs with me. I did all these things the way my husband wanted me to do. I again reiterate that there is no truth in any of the allegation and these are all fabricated. I apologize to the office and Sh. V.S. Chauhan for my wrong doings and I assure you Sir that such type of things will not occur in future.
Sd/-
Dated: 20.04.2005 (ASHA ARYA)
Witness
1 J.B. Gupta
AO (Estt.) Sd/- 20/4/05
2 Jawahar Lal
A.O. (Admn.)
O/o (Audit) Delhi Sd/- 20/4/05
“Sr. DAG (Admn & A/CS)’’
Dy. No…….62……….
Date……21/4…..
The above letter verified by Defence witness one Mr. J B Guta & Mr. Jawahar Lal
I never massage on her abdomen and never threat her for money false aligation on me.
She borrow money from my wife Rs.1100/- and also she use to borrow money from other office colleagues this was verified by the bank statement of the complainant as well as the bank authorities.
Now the case is for final arguments on the above letters can i won the case or not?
Soma
28 August 2009 at 19:29
After filing a divorce suit the wife filed a case u/s 12 of PWVDA..it is purely a false case..PO while preparing the report never inquired and made it on sole version of complainant (it is repetition of complaint)..the case is false and complainant want to create pressure on his husband to withdraw the MAT suit...
What is the remedy to the husband?
Any case law?
venkat reddy
28 August 2009 at 08:26
in a criminal case deceased had given dying declaration that she has been harassed. But there is no continuous harassment earlier to that which is required in 306 IPC is there any citations in this regard, let me know.
venkat
PRAKASHCHANDRA MARU
27 August 2009 at 23:21
hello all learned experts
a lady suicide after the 11 years mairrage life during the period of 11 years no any dispute between the wife and husband after the death of lady fir was lodged against husband and father in law and alleged that the lady died due to adultry of her husband with another person but fact is not detacted by me but the relative of accused gave some medical papers of doctor regarding the ill mental health and the method of suicide is jumped into the wall by her self pls guide me that is the best defence with the documentary evidence in the bail application or not and pls provide the judgement for the release on the bail such type of offences
vinod bansal
27 August 2009 at 22:17
R/Members
will you plz provide me judgment "kapil deo singh vs king AIR 1950 PC 80 "
Thanx n Regards
A Truthseeker
27 August 2009 at 21:35
a few decades back the medical science mainly depends on observation for diagonising the disease. now the pathological tests are the sheet anchor of a doctor. but unfortunately the IOs do not exploit the modern scientific knowledge and still worse there is very few forensic laboratory.
fulltrottlle
27 August 2009 at 13:13
sir/madame,
my co entered into buying contract with an mnc importer.After not being able to deliver the products on time,we sent them mail stating that these products will now be invoiced directly to other buyers for whom we had initially ordered for.Then came price variations due to forex changes which were never confirmed by us as the prices on contracts were indian rs only.After seeing all these issues,the importer requested to change the purchase order of one buyer and other buyers orders were supplied to us with increased prices that we paid them for. unfortunately,the buyer who bought goods directly from importer defaulted on payments after having issued cheques as per the terms of purchase orders.Another issue cropped up is that we may have changed the PO from this buyer probably before the importer confirmed the same in writings but orally it was agreed by one of its employer.The importer has initiated the proceedings u/sec 138 and even threatened us with action for cheating and criminal breach of trust. as we had on intent to harm being a reputed firm, can we still be tried for ? can the case become criminal at all ?
Yogender Dagar
27 August 2009 at 12:37
Whether a party can file criminal case u/s 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act whose original cheque has been misplaced by his bank.Please mention some citation in this regard so that criminal proceeding may be initated against the drawer of the cheque. And what are other legal remedies which can be adopted by him for recovery of cheque amount.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Complaint case
a woman has been severly beaten by her brother's wife and then hospitalised. Can she file a criminal case under section 323/326/506 IPC if there is already prior pending PWDVA case against the Victim (here who is beaten)filed by her brother's wife?