lawyers friend
30 June 2008 at 20:04
sir,i from delhi but bank file one case u/s 37 civil from delhi and one case u/s 420 406 from chennai.....what i have to do.....court issue nbw aginst me in 406 ,420 case...it is possible court can do this.
sir what can i do sir??? who i cancel this nbw and trf case to delhi.or can challenge this case.what i do sir help me.......i really worried about this nbw any time police arrest me sir....please.....please help me.
can i file injection suite to stop bank file criminal case.
Lakshmi
30 June 2008 at 12:59
A friend of mine was importing goods from a Nepal company. After a period of about 7-8 years of business, there was a dispute about the outstandings. The Nepalese party said that they have to recover money from the Indian buyer where as the Indian buyer said that it has remitted excess money. Money transfer was by bank and on account.
Nepalese party has made a complaint of fraud in Nepal against the Indian party. An employee of Indian party visited Nepal about a year before the business came to an end. The complaint of fraud has been filed after about 1 and a half year after the last transaction of business between the two parties.
There is a civil suit pending before High Court in India which was filed by Nepalese party and a counter claim by Indian party.
What remedies are there to get the complain of fraud quashed in Nepal? Whether the Indian party has to hire an advocate in Nepal to get the justice? Whether the Indian party can write to Nepal police with the facts of the case?
You may not be aware of the Nepal law but please reply on the above facts treating as if the complaint has been registered in India against some Nepalese party.
Dheeraaj Siingh
29 June 2008 at 10:19
Sir, A cheque was issued to our vendoe on 22nd Aug'06.Cheque got bounced due to insufficient fund. No notice was issued to our company for recovery of the sum. Later when our vendor realised that time is lapsed already for serving notice he again represented the cheque in the month of Oct'06 and claims he has issued notice to our company after that, in support he has submitted one recepit of postal department without any AD in support. Also our company never received any such notice.What's the legal/judicial view under NI act 138 applicability in this case.
chandan
27 June 2008 at 23:22
loan above 20,000/- given in cash is prohibated in income tax act & whether loan amount above 20,000/- given in cash is legally recoverable debt u/s 138 N.I.Act, pls. also quote relevent case laws.
chandan
27 June 2008 at 23:15
Is unaccounted money (black money)which is not shown in income tsx returns & is given as loan is a lagally recoverable debt u/s 138 N.I.Act?
B.P. Bhardwaj
25 June 2008 at 11:55
X Ltd. has issued a cheque of Rs. 5.00 Lacs in favour of Y Ltd. During the course X Ltd. has paid Rs. 3.00 Lacs to Y Ltd. To recover balance amount of Rs. 2.00 Lacs Y Ltd. has deposited Cheque of Rs. 5.00 Lacs for clearance through its banker, cheque returned unpaid with remarks of STOP PAYMENT. Y Ltd. sent a legal notice to X Ltd. demanding dishonoured cheque amount and file a case u/s. 138 NI Act after expiry of notice period time. After filing of case X Ltd. given payment of Rs. 1.50 Lacs to Y ltd. Can Y Ltd. pursue the case for balance recovery.
Sumit Vats
24 June 2008 at 19:15
Under which sec. of the IPC or CrPC a person can go when a government officer not performs his job or wilfully neglects it.
Sumit Vats
24 June 2008 at 14:20
Judgments of superme court in granting anticipatory bail in serious offences, particularly in the case of cheating & forgery etc.case under sec -420,471 of ipc.
Bindu
24 June 2008 at 11:49
I am for the accused & the complainant is bank. The matter is at the stage of cross
In the present case the statutory notice is dated 25/06/2007 & no where in the complaint nor affidavit there is whisper of when it was posted, neither the A.D Token issued by the postal authority s exhibited.
The complainant states that the notice which was posted returned intimation Unclaimed & is deemed service as per General clauses . However , the intimation which was posted to the recipient of the letter i.e my client on 27/06/2007. The complainant has taken that date as service date to accused. And they have filed the complaint on 19th July 2007. My Question is of premature complaint
Here in the present case, the complainant have wrongly taken the intimation date from postal authority to collect the letter by my client as the date of service of the notice. Which cannot be assumed to be date of service
As the postal authority have to wait for 7 days from the intimation & if the recipient does not collect or is not able to receive the letter then it is returned to sender with endorsement of non service. Therefore it is the date of endorsement of non service which has to be counted as deemed service not the intimation date by the postal authority to recipient to collect the Letter.
Therefore , in my point of view the same is premature & infracturous complaint. Kindly guide me whteher I am correct. Kindly provide me with the citations of premature complaint.
Further they have not annexed the loan papers
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
legal search
Before search two or more respectable inhabitants of the locality not called. wate effect?