There was a FIR against my father in 2015. The words used in FIR was "my father, his son and his relative destroyed the boundary wall". My father has two sons, me and my brother, so it wasn't even clear on whose name FIR was filed. Later, my father and the other party came to an understanding as it was an misunderstanding and the FIR as dropped by them as they asked police to drop it. There was no arrest.
Police later filed final report stating that two other accused person's are unknown and parties have reached at understanding between them that there was misunderstanding between them. In none of the documents filed with final report in court, my name was mentioned.
Basically, the final report said that because both parties have cleared misunderstanding, so no point in continuing investigation. There was no trial or inquiry by court and final report was accepted by the court.
Will this situation affect me negatively during during police verification during government job?
What is meaning of - Case Disposed
Nature of Disposal Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated.
Kindly clearify the above statement passed by the court
Dear Experts,
My family is a tenant of commercial premises since 1948 in Delhi. We had a long ongoing dispute with an ex partner. In 2015, this ex partner made his Samdhi buy this premises who became the landlord.
First this landlord initiated legal proceedings calling my family illegal tenants and cited damage to the premises. He was proven wrong and rt before losing the case, he withdrew it.
By that time 5 yrs had passed, and then he initiated eviction against us citing bonafide need for his son which he won. He said that his son has quit job, is presently unemployed and wants to do business.
The review and appeal in high court was also dismissed.
The eviction deadline is 31st March. Meanwhile, We have come into possession of multiple documentary evidence which are a clear proof that landlord's bonafide claim is a total lie. Even the intention to open business can be proven otherwise.
We have realised that their is no relief for a tenant in the courts now. We tried giving these evidence in high court but were refused an opportunity to present it.
The landlord has lied not once but twice in the courts and engaged previously in frivolous and now false litigations against my family causing great drain on our mental peace and finances.
If we do not challenge the eviction any further, is there any way that the landlord can be tried for perjury.
We are under litigation with the person in the background (ex partner) for the last 42 years, and now his prop finally got us evicted.
Does a better title of property entitle a landlord to lie in the courts.
Regards
Swati
What if the IO of the case is served NBWA for not being able to appear in the Court can it be recall US 70 (2) CrPC
I have filed 156(3) crpc from competent court for investigation & lodge of FIR.
In spite of passing of one month police did not lodge FIR in spite of court's order received by police station.
This delay in justice is seems denial of justice.
Please guide me.
I went to local police station to lodge a complaint. Since police refused, hence I lodge written complaint before Commissioner of Police to treat my complaint as FIR. No action.
I forced to lodge complain before court U/S 156 (3) due to police inaction. After that one month is over. I went to PS but they asked money.
Till now police did not lodge FIR in spite of court's order. Please help.
Can police refused to lodge FIR in spite of court's order.
Sir, could i know that the compromise will be allowed between complainant and accused u/s, 482 cr p c for allegation of 3/4 pocso.
HI SIR
LOAN WAS TAKEN BY GIVING PROMISSORY NOTE PLUS CHEQUE AND HYPOTHICATING IMMOVABLE ASSETS
PROMISSORY NOTE VALIDITY EXPIRED
NOW DUE TO DISPUTE THE FIANCER PRESENTED CHEQUE AND IT WAS DISHONURED AND FILEED THE COMPLAINT UNDER SEC 138 AND 142 OF NI AC
IS IT VALID SINCE PRO NOTE EXPIRED AND LOAN TAKEN IS GURANTEED BY HYPOTHICATION OF ASSTES AND IT IS STILL VALID
PLEASE ADVISE THANK YOU
HI SIR
PRONOTE RECIVED -- EXPIRED
LOAN GIVEN IS GURANTEED BY HYPOTHICATION OF IMMOVABLE ASSETS MORE THAN THE
LOAN VALUE
ALSO SUPPOTED BY CHEQUE
CHEQUE WAS PRESENTED AND DISHONURED
CAN WE FILE COMPLAINT UNDER SEC 138 AND 142 OF NI ACT
Prove ipc 279/338 accident case without material evidence
My brother was hit by a truck from backside while he was driving cycle on the road. He got severe multiple fractures. police filed a case under IPC 279 and 338 based on the complaint given by me. The accused was released on the bail and the chargesheet is filed in the court.
Now i am filing civil case for compensation from the accused and insurance company. I reached to a lawyer and he went to PS and obtained the chargesheet and witness statements. But when we read the chargesheet, we found that there is no vehicle seizure memo, no mechanical inspection report and no material evidence on the record. Even the site map is wrong. Now my lawyer is not showing interest in accepting the case as it doesn't have any material evidence but only oral evidence which also has some mistakes.
My brother is bedridden now for 3 months and takes another 1 year to return to normal life due to which he is sent on unpaid leave.
what should i do if no lawyer is accepting my case and how will we be compensated?
how can we prove the accident just based on oral evidence?