monty lamba
28 April 2015 at 16:31
आल एक्सपर्ट्स नमस्ते,
सर,
मेरा एक सिविल सूट फॉर डिक्लेरेशन , पोस्सेस्सिओं एंड इंजंक्शन 2012 से चल रहा है और 2014 में एक आदमी(लैटे प्रॉपर्टी सेलर का भाई ) ने एक U/o 1 R 10 CPC, की एप्लीकेशन दे कर पार्टी बनना चाहता है, बेसिस ऑफ़ फेक एंड फैब्रिकेटेड वसीयत डाक्यूमेंट्स के दवारा |
ये एप्लीकेशन सिविल कोर्ट साकेत नई डेल्ही में लगायी गयी थी |
मैने वसीयत की सर्टिफाइड कॉपी तथा लैटे प्रॉपर्टी सेलर के बैंक सैलरी अकाउंट में सिग्नेचर की सर्टिफाइड कॉपी ( एक अन्ने कंप्लेंट में कोर्ट में बैंक दवारा दिया गया था) का एक्सपर्ट ओपिओन कराया तो पाया दोनों सिग्नेचर डिफरेंस है |
मैने एक कंप्लेंट केस मेट्रोपॉलिटिन मजिस्टेड के पास U/s 156(3) फाइल कर दिया, मेट्रोपॉलिटिन मजिस्टेड ने स्टेटस रिपोर्ट कंसर्नेद पुलिस स्टेशन से कॉल किया जहाँ पर प्रॉपर्टी है |
सर,
पुलिस अफसर ने अपनी स्टेटस रिपोर्ट में सब बाते लिखने के बाद लिखा की क्युकी अक्सोउसेड ने वसीयत नामा एक सिविल सूट में साकेत कोर्ट में लगाया है इसलिए ये कंप्लेंट उनके पुलिस स्टेशन के जुडिशल के बहार का है इस लिए इसे साकेत पुलिस स्टेशन में ट्रांसफर करदेना चाइये |
अभी आर्गुमेंट के लिए दो महीने का टाइम है किर्पया आप बतये ये ठीक है या नहीं ?
क्या मुझे फिर से कम्पेंट फाइल करना पड़ेगा ? अगर नहीं तो कोई इस पर जजमेंट भेजे क्यों की पुलिस अफसर अकसर शॉर्टकट यूज़ करने के फ़िराक में रहते है | प्लीज हेल्प प्लीज हेल्प
WHATSAPP 91-8075113965
16 July 2014 at 09:32
SIRS,
I need your help sirs,
i am appearing in a 138 case for the accused.
Actually the accused is a Pvt Ltd Company.
so, the complainant has arrayed 4 persons as accused ......A1 is the company itself, in its official capacity....A2 is shown as "Director" of ....company.....A3 and A4 are two induviduals, shown as "cheif operating officer and executive vice president "....
in the complaint, it is avermed that A2 and A4 represented themselves as persons in charge of management of affairs of business and dealings.
No other document produced to prove this.. just a mere averment.
only A4 person signed the cheque.
case is that :
the was an oral business agreement between the accused and the complainant and the accused took 1 lakh as advance amount and subsequently failed to comply with the terms of the agreement. so the complainant
asked for the money he paid . the the accused gave a cheque , which subsequently
bounced. this is the case .
here, whether i can take the plea that cheque was taken as a security and hence 138 NI Act is not applicable, as per Bombay High court Citation ?
whether any witness is required for the payment of money in 138 cases ?
complaint has been filed against 4 accused , but, notice has been issued only against 3 persons .is it will vitiate the trial ?
( actually there are only 2 persons , other two persons are "legal persons"..ie, cheif operating officer" and "vice president. " )
these are the facts of the case ...
trial is fast approaching .....
so, please help me ....
PLEASE TELL ME WHAT ARE THE DEFENCES I CAN TAKE IN THIS CASE...
WHAT ARE THE POINTS I SHOULD HIGHLIGHT IN CROSS EXAMINATION OF THE COMPLAINANT ?
TELL ME APT CITATIONS ( PREFERABLY OF SUPREME COURT OR KERALA HIGH COURT ) SUITABLE FOR 138 CASE , AGAINST PVT LTD COMPANIES AND ITS DIRECTORS .....
THANKING YOU ALL IN ADVANCE , SIR, ....
SALIL KUMAR
ADVOCATE
THALASSERY
9447536929
9061435365
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Crpc 107:151, adum check,rajinama in police station
i have a crpc 107:151 ,adum check ,and rajinama in local police station against me .. is it any criminal record against me ? my neighbour family filed a case for beating against me in 2011 police booked me under crpc 107:151 i paid a bond of 500rs in sdm court the complainant also paid a bond , then nothing happen ,the lawyer told my father this case will be close in 6 months , one boy filed a report in police station against me for beating ,but he taken back his complaint immediataly ,3rd case is rajinama my neighbor family beat me recently , i had a rajinama with them in local police station .. i want to know is it any criminal recored against me? if i aplly for passport and visa is this cases bother me ?pls tell..