Dear Seniors,
Does the accused have the right to receive POLICE Diary and exhibits of the evidence collected from the complainant without RTI.
or
What does the accused have right to get from the station except Case Diary.
Dear Ld. Members
the below quoted rule is of
DP Rules - Tamil Nadu .
"as per rule 5(X) of the Dowry Prohibition Rules, the Dowry Prohibition officer should ascertain the genuiness of the complaint"
Any such rule for DP Rules in AP
pleases can anyone let me know in this regard as there is now dowry taken in my case.
Dear all,
Can any one provide order/Circular/Memo
"Information about 498a-compoundable"
in AP which was released DC Correspodnet passed by POLICE OFFICER UMPATHI
on last year April 2010.
If any one have a copy can also upload it.
Please anyone help in this regard
raam
Dear expert,
Please clearify the legal question that has been taken up by the defence during hearing on bail before the Chief Judicial Magistrate that Bhutani currency does not come within the ambit of FERA. Is it right or wrong ? My other question is that the case of FERA ( Now FEMA) is triable by a special court or magistrate triable /sessions triable ? Please give sections.
Dear Experts
The muslim parent want to claim their child from adoptive parent u/s 21 of DV act. [ adoption deed made- it was legally not valid) but adoptive parents got guardianship order from Dist Court.
In this position its possible to claim their child u/s 21 of DV act
SIR,
IN ORDER TO OBTAIN CONSTRUCTION SANAD FOR AN AREA OF 425 SQUARE METERS A PERSON WENT TO THE EXTENT OF IMPERSONATING THE PERSON WHOSE NAME APPEARED IN FORM I&XIV OF THE PROPERTY. IT WAS REPORTED TO THE DY COLLECTOR AND THE POLICE STATION OF THE OFFENCE AND A COMPLAINT WAS FILED BY DEPUTY COLLECTOR BEFORE THE JMFC. AFTER GATHERING THE EVIDENCE OF HANDWRITING ANALYSIS CHARGE SHEET IS FILED BEFORE THE JMFC. LATELY DURING INQUIRY IT WAS INFORMED THAT THIS CASE WAS FOR ARGUMENT BEFORE TRIAL. THE IMPERSONATER CLAIMES THAT HE WAS FALSLEY ACCUSED BY THE COMPLAINANTS. THE IMPERSONATER CLAIMS HE HAS BY MISTAKE AND WITHOUT KNOWING SIGNED THE NAME OF THE PERSON APPEARING IN FORM I&XIV AS IT IS AN ALIAS NAME OF HIS LATE FATHER. THE FATHER'S NAME IN BIRTH CERTIFICATE OF THE IMPERSONATOR DIFFERS FORM THE NAME APPEARING IN THE SAID FORM. MOREOVER THE ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROCEQUTOR IS THE WIFE OF THE LAWYER REPRESENTING THE IMPERSONATOR IN A CIVIL CASE IN CONNECTION WITH THE SAME PROPERTY THAT WAS LATLY ENCROACHED AND FRAUDULENTLY PARTITIONED PREVIOUSLY. THOUGH THE IMPERSONATOR HAS ANOTHER LAWYER REPRESENTING THE CRIMINAL CASE, THERE IS EVERY LIKELYHOOD OF A COMPROMISE AND FAILURE ON PART OF THE APP TO PENALISE THIS CULPRIT. I AM THE COMPLAINANT IS THERE ANY THING I CAN DO TO PREVENT THE MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE.
SIR,
IN ORDER TO OBTAIN CONSTRUCTION SANAD FOR AN AREA OF 425 SQUARE METERS A PERSON WENT TO THE EXTENT OF IMPERSONATING THE PERSON WHOSE NAME APPEARED IN FORM I&XIV OF THE PROPERTY. IT WAS REPORTED TO THE DY COLLECTOR AND THE POLICE STATION OF THE OFFENCE AND A COMPLAINT WAS FILED BY DEPUTY COLLECTOR BEFORE THE JMFC. AFTER GATHERING THE EVIDENCE OF HANDWRITING ANALYSIS CHARGE SHEET IS FILED BEFORE THE JMFC. LATELY DURING INQUIRY IT WAS INFORMED THAT THIS CASE WAS FOR ARGUMENT BEFORE TRIAL. THE IMPERSONATER CLAIMES THAT HE WAS FALSLEY ACCUSED BY THE COMPLAINANTS. THE IMPERSONATER CLAIMS HE HAS BY MISTAKE AND WITHOUT KNOWING SIGNED THE NAME OF THE PERSON APPEARING IN FORM I&XIV AS IT IS AN ALIAS NAME OF HIS LATE FATHER. THE FATHER'S NAME IN BIRTH CERTIFICATE OF THE IMPERSONATOR DIFFERS FORM THE NAME APPEARING IN THE SAID FORM. MOREOVER THE ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROCEQUTOR IS THE WIFE OF THE LAWYER REPRESENTING THE IMPERSONATOR IN A CIVIL CASE IN CONNECTION WITH THE SAME PROPERTY THAT WAS LATLY ENCROACHED AND FRAUDULENTLY PARTITIONED PREVIOUSLY. THOUGH THE IMPERSONATOR HAS ANOTHER LAWYER REPRESENTING THE CRIMINAL CASE, THERE IS EVERY LIKELYHOOD OF A COMPROMISE AND FAILURE ON PART OF THE APP TO PENALISE THIS CULPRIT. I AM THE COMPLAINANT IS THERE ANY THING I CAN DO TO PREVENT THE MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE.
Hi,
Would you please help me with the following details of the case described below?
Case is: Person wated to kill britan's Foreign Minister. But, he killed his secretary by mistake!
Queries are:
1. What is the name of this case law?
2. What were the issues?
3. What was the decision in this case with Reasons?
Thanks a lot in advance! :)
my grandmother lives with my father at my late grandfathers house( which has been mutated and declared in his will ,that the house would go to my father) .My fathers brother lives in a separate house( built on a separate piece of land as indicated by my grandfather in his will).
off late,my grandmother at the insistence of her younger son went to police station to register complaint on the fact that my father was refusing to hand over the furniture's that belonged to my grandmother,as she wants to move in to her younger sons house.but my father stated he would readily allow her to leave with the furnitures(which are not indicated in the will to belong to my father),if she gives a written statement on bond paper and in presence of court that she is leaving on her own wishes and that she hasn't been subjected to torture in leaving this house.my father made this condition to avoid unwanted legal hassles that may arise if my grandmother complains after moving to her younger sons house that she was tortured in leaving the house of her elder son which was initially her husbands house.
my grandmother doesn't wishes to go through the court proceedings for writing the statement in presence of judge.altogether she is summarily trying to avoid the legal procedures that my father told to her.
my request is what should be the next step in order to avoid the inevitable that may arise once she moves her to her younger sons house.what can we do to notify the court and not fall on the wrong side of law after she moves and accuses my father of mistreating her.
What is the procedure for 340CRPC application
Thnak you very much all expert to suggest me and give me the valuable advice to me. Shri Bhupendra sharmaji u have told the Judgement of apex court to this effect that it should be decided after the evidence is lead in respect of the same. More so the discretion has to be exeercised in judicial manner not in arbitrary manner as suggested above. Can you please provide me that judgement because it is very much urgent and valuable for me. Ajay Reddy