Pankaj Kumar Singh
19 March 2009 at 17:22
Hi,
What recourse lies for the complainant after discharge of accused by Magistrate in a case of cheating & forgery.
Regards,
Pankaj.
Pankaj Kumar Singh
19 March 2009 at 16:58
Hi,
What recourse lies for the complainant after discharge of accused by Magistrate in a case of cheating & forgery.
Regards,
Pankaj.
N.K.Assumi
19 March 2009 at 06:00
Dear All,
I will appreciate if any one of you can provide me the judgment of Ramchandra Ram Reddy and others Vs The State of Maharashtra.This case relates to narco analysis test, brain mapping etc and its validity. Thanking you all in advance.
sampoorna
18 March 2009 at 22:00
Respected to all,
this is sampoorna, many of you know about my case, my husband is upscanding since four years and a non-bailable warrant is pending on his name on dowry prohibition act in nampally court,from 2005 to till date, where as my in laws are coming to the court and giving attendance,
i had given the complaint to women police station begeumpet,in the year of 2005 because i live in hyderabad the police after investigation they have filed charge sheet in the nampally court on cc no 473, my father-in-law went to high court to quash the fir, in the year of 2005 but the honerabel high court had dismissed the case, after vacating the stay my in-laws are coming to the lower court, now gain my father-in-law had given the petition to the high court asking to quash the 498 case in the lower court. which is pending on cc no 473,stating that,i am living in hyderabad, and my in-laws stay in warangel, and the offence took place in warengel, so, the courts in hyderabad had no territorial jursdiction to entertain the case.
i request you all to pls clear my query, since i am in hyderabad i had given a complaint to my near police station, and my marriage took place in the year of 2003 in hyderabad,is there any such rule passed that the compliant should be given at the place of offence,do nampally court had no right to run the case?, will high court will quash the case in the napally court based on this?
pls tell me...
thanking you,
sampoorna
advocate satya
18 March 2009 at 14:26
hi
i want to ask if a traffic policeman saw someone crossing red light or any offence under MVact he issues challan, how the law agree with the witnessing of traffic police only that the violation is occured, whereas even in other cases witnessing simply by one man that too who is empowered to challan or file FIR is not sufficient, any view? if someone wants to contest the case what he will do when the witnessing of traffic police only says that he had seen the violation, he can do that with enemity also or to get revenue for the govt. as well?
vinod bansal
17 March 2009 at 21:25
Sir
In a crl case one accused was awarded life imprisonment while another was awarded 7 yr imprisonment by sessions court,in which bench (Single or double judge bench ) of Punjab Haryana highcourt bail application of 7 yr awarded accused Bail Application will be heard.Thanks
vinod bansal
17 March 2009 at 21:21
Sir
What is defination of Husband for the purpose of section 304-B IPC.Thanks
vinod bansal
17 March 2009 at 21:21
Sir
What is defination of Husband for the purpose of section 304-B IPC.Thanks
HARISH CHANDRA JHA
16 March 2009 at 18:31
Dear Sir,
I am working in a chartered accountant firm as an accountant.
My office have two branch one is Rani Bagh Delhi & second is Punjabi Bagh Delhi, in both offices there is a 4-5 K.M. distance.
One day i was got for lunch for few time and my boss (CA) said to my coolick that pls, come in ranibagh office and take some cash for general expeses. he went by my byke (two wheeler) without of my permission and he have not any Driving Licence. at the time of returning with cash there was a misshappening in which my coolick dead in hospital within 24 hour's Know his parents demand for compansetation to me is there my liability or my boss liability.
Pls, clear as soon as posible and overcome to me from this problem i am very warry form this.
Pushkar
09313301634
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
TIME BARRED
hi
if there is a case of cheque bounce and the limitations of three years is been passed, if the accused shows the cheque amount as in his income tax return will the limitations extends? i heard a recent judgement on this is it true? further i want to ask can the information of any person as to his income tax return can be got from income tax dept. under RTI?