raju
31 December 2021 at 20:17
Court proceeded under section 200 for complainant examination and list of witness on date fixed pre coginance. On fixed date complainant was examined and documents filed. Mu query is whether court had taken pre coginance. Can witnesses be summoned in support of complainant complaint.
Anonymous
30 December 2021 at 20:20
sir can anyone advice me what does " framing of charge or plea means
Anonymous
29 December 2021 at 11:22
I am preparing for Govt jobs and about to write exams. Two months back when I am driving a car, I accidentally hit a person from back and he got fracture in his leg. I took the victim to nearby hospital and provided first aid and paid for it.
The injured filed a complaint against me and IPC 338 is imposed on me. Recenty I got summons from court for appearance.
The victim filed an MVOP case claiming 1 crore as compensation as I had all valid documents.
I am worried now. I am only earning member of my family. Will i get govt job with this court case pending on me ? Please help me how to get out of two cases on me
Anonymous
17 December 2021 at 23:16
Sir,
My wife gave a CSR Complaint and type is abuse in September - 2019. and we were living together till dec -2020. Currently we are separated and we both live in abroad.. we file divorce petition in residential foreign country.
I haven’t received any information or called for investigation... No action from police station till today.
My question ?
1. How long does the CSR complaint exist in the police station?
2. what is the possible way to close the case.
3. since i m not living in Indian. is that possible to Higher lawyer to close the CSR police case?
Your valuable advice would be helpful.
Thanks
Thanks
Ananda
15 December 2021 at 13:11
Dear Experts,
Based on some earlier suggestions,I asked my previous counsel to give NOC, however he collected the noc fees (gpay) but still has been evading me saying he is out of town etc. So we would like to file an affidavit with proof of communication with my counsel and request court to allow us to submit arguments as party. Court told us to submit written args after NOC or after we file affidavit.
Should each respondent file a separate affidavit to discharge the counsel, or a single affidavit is enough for both respondents? Also, on next date are both respondents required to be present? second respondent is my mother who may not be able to come, so I was thinking if I can submit her affidavit.
Please suggest.
Anonymous
12 December 2021 at 14:31
sir
If civil suit submissions such as plaint, affidavits, are contrary to their own exhibits, does this attracts perjury?
SANDEEP Singh
10 December 2021 at 19:59
Dear sir,
As mentioned above subject matter, im presently released on bail under section 302 ipc in 2019 by hon'ble punjab high court division bench after serving 5 years and 3 months imprisonment. The court while granting bail relied upon Dharampal vs state of Haryana, 1999 judgement and granted bail. However, my in laws have filed a plea against the order of grant of bail citing the illegality of the said judgement. My question to the expert team are:-
1. Under what circumstances, supreme court would dismiss bail given by hon'ble punjab high court division bench, if any.
2. Please cite any judgement where supreme court upheld bail given by court who relied on Dharampal vs state of Haryana judgement
OR
3. Any supreme court judgement where Dharampal vs state of Haryana judgement was challenged for above said subject matter, however apex court dismissed the plea?
Regards,
Siva
02 December 2021 at 18:51
I have crpc 417 & 420 on me. Person A lodge complaint on me with some of her associates person B, C and D. Police lodge complaint and taken statement B, C and D as evidance of this case. In fact, police taken money from them and supporting them. Police summoned 2-3 times to go police station for enquiry, but i didnt go as i know police wont talk for me. Then police filed chargesheet and case started 5 years ago, until last month person A to D and police never appear to court for hearing, but every month i went court. Suddenly all people A, B, C & D came to court and just reitterate what they told in the complaint and as per chargesheet. Actualy the case is, A is telling me i got huge money from her with no evidence. Person B, C and D are her friends, they just went to police station when she complaint me. Police treated B, C and D as evidence for what A given in the complaint, but not direct evidence for that money transaction.
My lawer never cross question actively when A, B, C, D on the box during the enquiry in the court, but he says, now we can just hear what ABCD tell to the court. Actual argument will happen only later stage. No need to cross question them when they stand on the box. I thought he should cross question them when they stand in box in front of judge instead just hear and finally arge with opponent lawyer. I suspect they may not come back to court or opponent lawyer can oppose to not bring them to court later when my lawer request.
Is court procedure is like that? Is my lawyer says true? Otherwise can I meet Judge in person to explain my side?
Anonymous
29 November 2021 at 23:24
For a number of years now, High Court has repeatedly passed orders contrary to the law, dismissing our criminal writ petitions thrice, and always denying relief sought. This has happened even during the pandemic. Moreover, two applications for placing on record some vital documents have been left pending, while deciding the most recent writ petition.
Is this repeated conduct of the High Court of not following the concerned Act and the law, and now also leaving two applications for placing on record some vital documents pending, while dismissing the writ petitions and denying the relief sought, constitute gross injustice sufficient enough to file an SLP on this ground?
Or is it advisable to raise questions of law in the SLP?
Sorry for being anonymous, but it is important.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Non payment of price of goods by dealer
To
The respected senior fellow experts
A dealer of our company had not paid for the goods delivered by our Company in spite of repeated intimation letters for payment were send from our company. More than six months had been passed since the last intimation letter dispatched.
One clause in the agreement between dealer and company is/was " UNTIL FULL PAYMENT MADE BY THE DEALER THE PROPERTY IN GOODS REMAINS TO THE PROPERTY OF THE OWNER(COMPANY)".
My query to the respected fellow experts is:
On the basis of the above written clause can we lodge a FIR under section 415(cheating) & under section 403(criminal misappropriation of property ) under IPC?
Regards
Abhijit