Anonymous
30 May 2023 at 00:51
Sir I engaged an advocate for legal advice for land which I want to purchased. Lawyer gave me non encumbrance certificate telling that the land I want to purchase is free from all encumbrance and of clear title.
On believing on his report I entered into registered agreement to sell with that party.
Here it is important to mention that agreement of sell was drafted and executed by this advocate only.
Before due date of agreement I gave balance money to party and he executed sale deed.
Again here it is important to mention here that saledeed was also drafted by my same advocate to whom I engaged and paid fees.
Now when I move my application for mutation it was rejected because the person from whom I first entered agreement to sell and after saledeed that person already sold land to someone else even before my agreement.
When I contacted lawyer who made report and agreement to sell and than sale deed he told that he didn't inspected the books of revenue office.
Being aggrieved I filed police complaint against person from whom I purchased land and also against lawyer who continously first on legal report than on agreement and than on saledeed deceived me.
But police filed chargesheet against seller and fr in favor of advocate.
I filled protest application against lawyer in court but lower court reject it.
Than I filed revision in district court the same Also rejected on ground that no criminal case against lawyer.
In my case there is full involvement of lawyer. May be not at beginning but when he knew that he didn't inspected paper why did he induced me in agreement and after that also he can save my money stopping me to not to give balance money and he drafted and executed in saledeed.
All citation are telling no criminal case against lawyer.
My all hard earned money finished.
Shall I proceed high court or not.
Pls advice
Lokesh D
24 May 2023 at 23:50
Hight Court of Karnataka Daily Order:
Heard the learned counsel for petitioner.
Issue emergent notice to respondent No.2, returnable by 20.06.2023.
The petition calls in question the proceedings in C.C.No.XXXX/XXXX, pending before the XXIX Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru.
A perusal at the complaint or the summary of the charge sheet would clearly indicate that there is no allegation against the father in-law and the mother in-law, who are admittedly living separate are made, while sprinkling allegations are made against other accused.
Therefore, there shall be an interim order of stay of the proceedings in C.C.No.XXXX/XXXX, qua petitioner Nos.1 and 2 – father in-law and mother in-law.
Insofar as petitioner No.3 - brother in-law is considered, the same would be considered on the appearance of the respondent No.2.
Accordingly, I.A.No.1/2022 is allowed in-part.
List the matter on 20.06.2023.
In the above order, Emergent Notice will be issued by whom?
Manoj Gupta
22 May 2023 at 19:36
I am an employee of a Govt Institution. I suspected couple of my colleagues of indulging in malpractices like bribery.
I intimated the same to my Vigilance department. Now these two people have come to know about me and threatening of criminal defamation.
Does my act amounts to defamation without much proof?
Sachin Kumar
21 May 2023 at 20:27
Three days before , Youth (major in age) caught on camera had beaten security guard when guard told him to do entry in register, the mother of youth had given fake complaint of eve teasing against RWA President.
The medical of security guard is done.
Now Youth mother is saying to RWA president: when you will take complaint back against my son then I will also withdraw complaint of eve teasing.
Police is also favouring youth and his mother.
What legal remedies are available for RWA president ?
Anonymous
21 May 2023 at 14:03
What if someone is falsely implicated under the Atrocities Act. Its a case of personal enemosity & revenge. FIR is done...no proper investigation done, chargesheet about to be filed.
BHARTI KOTHARI
19 May 2023 at 16:38
That accused No.1 has taken loan from bank and accused No.2 &3 were gurantoor. the bank has obtained blank cheque from accused no.1. the accused No.1 expired and therefore emi were defaulted and the bank deposited the cheque which were bounced and therefore 138 complaint was filled against all 3 person i.e. signatory to cheque as well against gurantoor. in my opinion the complaint is not maintainable against accused No.2 & 3. please advice how to proceed
Anonymous
13 May 2023 at 16:30
I would like to seek your guidance regarding an incident involving a complaint I filed at the police station. I reported an instance of rash driving by an individual. Subsequently, the police officer contacted the person in question, and unexpectedly, they offered me Rs. 1000 as compensation for damages, which I had not requested. Additionally, the police officer compelled me to write a statement on a paper stating that both parties had reached a compromise, and I had accepted the compensation for my damages.
I want to know whether the paper I wrote and signed at the police station is legal or not and I am barred to register an FIR for that matter.
Jade Tod
12 May 2023 at 16:32
I will repeatedly recommend Hack West to help anyone recover a lost coin or token. I mistakenly clicked on a link posted via twitter for an airdrop claim, and before I could realize it all my coins and USDT had been wiped off my wallet. A friend recommended HACKWEST at WRITEME dot COM despite the terms, the communication skill is perfect and that was important to me, he helped recover my stolen coins worth 166,000 USD from the scammer. He further helped to fix my poor credit by clearing bankruptcy chapter 7, eviction, charge offs, loans and collections. I was able to buy my own home after my credit was raised to 790. I strongly recommend Hack West.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Cheque bounce criminal case complainant expired
Dear Experts,
My father passed away on April 2023 where he is a complainant in a Criminal Case for cheque bounce. As a legal heir, If I want to proceed the case further with my lawyer (say Mr.X), Should I get NOC from my Father's lawyer (Say Mr.Y) ? or If I want to continue the case with the existing lawyer Mr.Y, Am I need to sign POA / Vakkalat once again ?