MALAY KUMAR DEB
06 June 2012 at 18:22
Sir,
If any Govt./Govt. Undertaking calls tender without mentioning anything about SSI/NSIC Benefit in their clauses of tender and if one of the bidder comes with demanding these facilities on tender opening what will be the legal steps to be taken out by bidder for availing the facilities like...EMD return(though he deposited), 15% rate relaxation against 1st lowest who is not SSI/NSIC accredited and exemption of SD in terms of BG/Performance Guarantee. The bidder has submitted all the related docs on SSI/NSIC during submission of Tender. If the authority do not decide the matter favouring SSI facilities what legal steps to be followed by the BIDDER.
durgadas
04 June 2012 at 18:39
my father purches agriculcharal land from protected tenant by agriment to sale and afedivitin year 1972
tenant agri for obtening nesasari permission and deliver possession to my father
after gating permissin hi make saledeed
but hi cant apply for permission
after two year tenant make application to revanu department for restoration of possession
year 1981 this application is dissmiss in difolt for nonappearance of applicant
my question is. 1) what action taken by my father for sale deed
2) after 32 year dissmisal of sut for restoretion can reopen
DV Rao Advocates-Hyderabad, (C
30 April 2012 at 14:57
For the profession of Advocacy why two ability tests. According to Sec 30 of The advocates Act, 1966, every advocate has right to practice in any court of India once his/her name enrolled in any state Bar. At the same time according to the Rules of Supreme Court AoR examination is conducting. Bar Council of India recently made compulsory that All India Bar examination. Why two ability tests for one profession?
DV Rao Advocates-Hyderabad, (C
27 April 2012 at 21:28
http://csis.ap.nic.in/MainInfo.jsp?mtype=WP&mno=12309&year=2012
DV Rao Advocates-Hyderabad, (C
28 February 2012 at 00:10
Either the Advocacy or the Judiciary must follow the law and obey the law.
Either Petitioner’s Advocate or the Defendant’s Advocate must follow the law for pray the relief. The rule of practice never says to pray for any relief against the law or to give support to the wrong doers. So, If we analyze the Judgement it shall be support the winning Advocate for maximum of 60% and the defendant Advocate for a minimum of 40%. Other wise it can create the opinion that the defendant Advocate either not following the law or he/she is supporting the wrong doers.
The Judiciary also must follow and obey the law for giving Judgments, Hence the Judiciary must frame the rules on the every petition like as PIL. If the defendant Advocate fail to get a relief of at least 40% according to his prayer, then the Judiciary award him/her with penalty. Because here law is common to all these.
Then, The qualitative legal service can be expected and legal service can reach the poor.The wrong doers also will fear to approach the Court.
Hence, The percentage of crime rate and corruption, Pendency can be controlled in our country.
Sincerely
DVRao,
Practicing Advocate,
Supreme Court of India
DV Rao Advocates-Hyderabad, (C
20 February 2012 at 17:03
Either the Advocacy or the Judiciary must follow the law and obey the law.
Either Petitioner’s Advocate or the Defendant’s Advocate must follow the law for pray the relief. The rule of practice never says to pray for any relief against the law or to give support to the wrong doers. So, If we analyze the Judgement it shall be support the winning Advocate for maximum of 60% and the defendant Advocate for a minimum of 40%. Other wise it can create the opinion that the defendant Advocate either not following the law or he/she is supporting the wrong doers.
The Judiciary also must follow and obey the law for giving Judgments, Hence the Judiciary must frame the rules on the every petition like as PIL. If the defendant Advocate fail to get a relief of at least 40% according to his prayer, then the Judiciary award him/her with penalty. Because here law is common to all these.
Then, The qualitative legal service can be expected and legal service can reach the poor.The wrong doers also will fear to approach the Court.
Hence, The percentage of crime rate and corruption, Pendency can be controlled in our country.
Sincerely
DVRao,
Practicing Advocate,
Supreme Court of India
DV Rao Advocates-Hyderabad, (C
20 February 2012 at 17:01
http://wp.me/p23h5P-s
Anonymous
12 August 2011 at 12:06
Due to Reservations, Is India taking more time for its development?
Anonymous
12 August 2011 at 11:42
What are the special insurances are there for and favour of advocates? Recently, Bar Council of A.P announced Rs 3,00,000 insurance to every advocate by taking Rs 50 on each petition.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Walkathon (paada yaatra) 3-24 dec'2012 by dvrao advocates
DVRao Advocates' walkathon (Paada Yaatra) 3-24 Dec'2012 aimed to make COURTS OPEN FOR 24 HOURS to reduce GIGANTIC PENDENCY of 3.2 crores of cases by increase judge strength 15 per million of population to 50 per million of population.