LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

AMIT TANEJA   23 August 2009 at 20:09

date of exam / formalities

when THE DELHI JUDICIARY EXAMS CONDUCTED
WTS THE ELIGIBLITY
WHEN CONDUCTED
SYLLABUS
HOW TO PREPARE THE EXAMS
AND TO SUCCESSFULLY CLEAR THEM

Arun Krishnan   23 August 2009 at 19:42

Evidentiary value of video conferencing

How far can video conferencing be regarded as evidence before courts?

A Truthseeker   23 August 2009 at 19:35

trial

what are the stages from lodging of FIR to framing of charge before court of sessions.

nitmuk   23 August 2009 at 19:28

proclaimed offender section 498a

Sir,
Arrest warrant has been issued against me under section 498a. I dint show up in the court since I am working in USA. Now I have been declared as proclaimed offender.

>> What should I do now?
>> Is it safe to continue staying in USA?
>> Would the Indian emabassy in USA impound my paasport?
>> My wife knows that I am in USA . What all she can do to get me back to India and screw my career, since this is what she wants, to ruin my career.

Member (Account Deleted)   23 August 2009 at 19:07

Plead for relative

Who are those relatives on behalf of whom an advocate can not plead?
Where I will get the actual provision relating to this?

sudhir shobha   23 August 2009 at 18:33

ownership of parking slot in stilt

i had paid for parking slot in the stilt of building to the builer, before formation of co-op hsg soc so now am i eligable for parking slot

Ritesh Mulchandani   23 August 2009 at 18:32

VOICE RECORDING AS AN EVIDENCE

I WANT TO KNOW THAT CAN A VOICE RECORDING BY A MOBILE HAS BEEN ADMISSIBLE AS AN EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL CASES IN INDIAN COURT AS PER LAW.
Regards
Ritesh Kumar
Ujjain(M.P.)

Sameer   23 August 2009 at 12:52

section 138 applicable or not

have purchased a land from A by paying him half the amount of total consideration with some conditions like measuring the land,removing the encrochement, the land not reserved,etc.but all conditions was not fulfilled by the sellar so i issued him notice to comply the conditions in sale deed and in event of the conditions are not fulflllied i will be restrained to stop the cheque thouh he did not reply my notice and not fulfilled the comditions mentioned in the registered sale deed so i stopped the cheque, my account was having more than amount of cheque. he presented the cheque to the bank my bank sent him the memo with having remark as payment stopped by the drawer, so he sent me notice u/s 138 ni act i promptly replied to it mentining tjhe facts,but he filed with criminal case u/s 138 against me, the more of the above is that he supressed the facts of the sale deed from the magistrate,so he issued the process, here what remedy is available to me i am very much afraid because it the criminal case me.I am ready to pay the said amount as soon as he compleates the what he has agreed in the sale deed.
i have already moved to high court and the hon high court has stayed the procedings of the trial court, but i an still worried, i have filled regular civil suit also at senior division against the person.

kindly help me by sending me the recent judjements and suggestions.

please help me.

jasdeep singh grewal   23 August 2009 at 12:30

reservation in direct recruitment in state govt departments

1.when the candidate applied in reserve category like sc/st why he counted towards general if he get good merit, what is the creteria for it.
2.further if the reserve person wants to be continue in reserve category, can he continue.
3.the reserve candidate like sc/st and BC when applied in particular category which law/rule allow the employer to put them in general category if they get good merit.

Satyendra Varma   23 August 2009 at 12:21

Expert advise sought on Bond Money taken from IT co.employee

Erstwhile Satyam has been asking its new joinees to sumit a Bank Guarantee of Rs.2Lac only then you are applicable to join Satyam.The BG remains in force for 2 years, in case you quit before 2 years for any reasons, satyam encashes the BG.In case u hv taken loan on arrangement from SBI , the bank automatically gives the amt.to Satyam on their claiming it and then hounds the employee for paying the money with all interest. Many employees have suffered heavily on this.I don't care for those who left Satyam for greener pastures in the same industry, but those who were from non - IT background and were attracted by the lusture of IT, but somehow could not adjust in the new environment after joining, and thought of taking back step and going back to their conventional fields are the worst suffereres . Even if the IT co. in which they worked has not invested in their training etc.they still encash the BG of the employee . The copy of BG is never handed over to the employee.These poor guys are being forced to shell out the bond money (BG) for their act of detaching from the firm in which they could not contribute and were a potential non-contributors , realising only after joining it. Its a trauma for them for first to lose a job in an IT Sector which they fancied their best choice, and then also pay for bond money. I call for genuine opinion and advise of the experts of this article for such cases, whether the bond money should be waived off for such unfortunate cases or not by the co.This as per me is torturous and exploitation of innocent victims.I too am one of those victims.